Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*miata\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*miata\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 03:30:58 -0700; Let me try to shed some light on the situation. Any parties that were involved (SCAC - SEB) who remember it differently or want to add, please do: CS has evolved into an 'affordable' sports car class; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00002.html (10,833 bytes)
2. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 09:56:59 -0700; well said and very brave I might add. A very excellent explination! thank you! sbw involved these membership 1.6l ringer solo classes that are Look at 24 Of it has the neon; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00022.html (12,002 bytes)
3. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: washburn <washburn@dwave.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 12:33:36 -0500; (the rest of Andy's explanation deleted) While the Snipster's response was more entertaining, this one hold more insight to the big picture that must be dealt with. In my mind, just because one adjus; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00028.html (8,168 bytes)
4. FW: miata????? (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 10:44:45 -0700; Jason Isley I appreciate the input. I do have to disagree about the "best stock class", it is fun to watch and there are allot of fast drivers. However the end result is still the same, RX7 first pla; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00032.html (12,475 bytes)
5. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:55:30 EDT; cars Look next BS? This is the type of question that the SCAC has been wrestling with for years. Remember also that the classes are not a progression from SS down to HS, in that a car that is too fas; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00044.html (9,214 bytes)
6. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 16:53:39 -0400; <<<CS has evolved into an 'affordable' sports car class. N/A MR-2, Fiero V6, Porsche 924S, 944, 240Z, N/A RX-7 all can be had for well under $10K. As these cars age, it is necessary to 'freshen' the; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00050.html (9,260 bytes)
7. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 14:06:16 -0700; Because similar cars are not as course dependant. If you mixed cars that are very different, then course becomes much more of a factor (yes, I know it already is). Just because I run the same times a; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00053.html (8,478 bytes)
8. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 17:27:38 -0400; I understand the rationale of trying to put cars in a class based on course dependencies, but I don't like it when people start putting labels on classes. IMHO that is why things got so screwed up fo; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00058.html (9,651 bytes)
9. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 14:42:31 -0700; I think the course dependancy issue is a very rational one. Cars that turn comparable times AND are alike, should be classed together. I think I would agree that is a new $40k car came out, and was a; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00062.html (10,298 bytes)
10. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 15:40:46 -0700; Beg to differ there Paul, but the 1.6's were gettin' out run by a bunch of 20 year 914s. Ask Steve Compton, Byron Short, Jeff or Stacy Reitmier how they feel about a 914 vs. a 1.6 Miata. The 1.8 Miat; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00064.html (9,104 bytes)
11. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 17:52:19 -0400; In that case never mind! I stand corrected. I was getting the 1.8s confused with the 1.6s. So then why in the world were the 1.6s put in BS??? Paul Foster; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00066.html (9,320 bytes)
12. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 16:07:05 -0700; One word, BoB. Best of Breed. Not that the 1.6's weren't competitive with the 914s, but the 914s were better. Kinda like the Vettes and RX-7s today I would think. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00070.html (8,340 bytes)
13. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Paul Foster <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 18:24:35 -0400; Oh, it's _you_ BoB. BoB sucks. It did then and it still does now. And it is more of an excuse than a rule. Why doesn't it still pertain? What magical event has happened that now means it should be ig; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00072.html (8,482 bytes)
14. miata????? (score: 1): Author: "Isley, Jason C." <JIsley@cell1.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 14:21:20 -0700; I know I am going to catch flak for this, but I have to ask.....I am a previous Miata owner, a 93' and a 95', have done a number of different things with them, SOLO2, open track events and drag raced; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01959.html (8,021 bytes)
15. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:09:12 -0700; Oooooooooo, OUCH! That's gotta hurt ;-) Good question Jason, I can hardly wait for the answer. Now lets just see if anyone has the ba..., ummm, guts to give the true answer ;-) sbw neon; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01961.html (8,800 bytes)
16. Re: miata????? (score: 1): Author: Whitney <whitneys@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:22:19 -0500; You know, when you look at it like that, it is pretty tough to justify, especially when those fast MR2's don't get moved to BS :) Stan Whitney 99 Miata; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01978.html (8,605 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]