Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mod\s+MGBs\s+was\:\s+RBB\s+owners\s+unite\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mod\s+MGBs\s+was\:\s+RBB\s+owners\s+unite\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. mod MGBs was: RBB owners unite. (score: 1): Author: "james" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 02:33:04 -0500; Gene, since you have an interesting selection of mods, I'd like to know which you prefer, for drivability, performance, etc? If you could only have one, based on mechanicals, which would it be? Why?; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00305.html (7,823 bytes)
2. Re: mod MGBs was: RBB owners unite. (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 08:34:19 -0600; I'm wondering about some things also. 1) Why is the ford rear end used so often in conversions? Is it strength? Seems an MGC rear end would do the same at an easier conversion. 2) Is the Datsun 5-spe; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00319.html (8,295 bytes)
3. mod MGBs was: RBB owners unite. (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:19:42 EST; Strong, compact, and not too heavy. The gearboxes on the 2000 (SRL 311) and 240 series had a lot of commonality. IMHO there is nothing wrong with the MG box with OD (unless you can't find one) The 19; /html/mgs/2003-03/msg00341.html (8,257 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]