Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*more\s+Re\:\s+Honda\s+2000\s+\-\s+Saw\s+it\s+last\s+night\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*more\s+Re\:\s+Honda\s+2000\s+\-\s+Saw\s+it\s+last\s+night\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. more Re: Honda 2000 - Saw it last night (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:57:27 EDT; << And the drawback is that you have no torque at low RPMs. They are not great off the line, until the revs hit 5500 or so. Remember, torque wins races, horsepower sells cars. The Honda has a 9000 RP; /html/spridgets/1999-09/msg01046.html (7,883 bytes)
2. Re: more Re: Honda 2000 - Saw it last night (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:10:19 EDT; << But I am not sure that there is no torque at low rpms - the whole point of the VTEC system is to ensure that you do have. I think you need to compare like with like and consider that any 2000cc no; /html/spridgets/1999-09/msg01048.html (7,886 bytes)
3. Re: more Re: Honda 2000 - Saw it last night (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:33:33 EDT; << I had just read the shootout in Road & Track magazine, and they thought it had no low end torque. "That said, let me repeat my suspicion that the (BMW Z3) 2.3 might impress a whole lot more (compa; /html/spridgets/1999-09/msg01096.html (7,447 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]