Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*more\s+power\s+\(but\s+we\s+have\s+styling\)\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob D." <bobmgtd@insightbb.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:43:40 -0500
I think the Pontiac Aztek and the Cadillac CTS tie for the "most ugliest car ever made by man". The Miata actually isn't too bad, compared to the current crop of chrome deficient, plastic look-a-like
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00336.html (8,340 bytes)

2. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: "BlackTulip" <BlackTulip@attbi.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 19:56:21 -0500
<<IMHO, our classic MGs are among the most beautiful cars ever made by Never seen A Big Healey or a Frogeye, huh Bob??? Sorry. Anon PS: N O T ! /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// A
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00337.html (7,754 bytes)

3. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 21:21:32 -0400
I love the style of the MG, and I also love (but don't own) an e-type jag, and others, but I have to admit that for current cars on the road I think the new convertible from, I think, Audi, is got a
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00339.html (8,379 bytes)

4. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Smith <ksmith40@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 21:32:31 -0500
My wife and I went to a car show in Tulsa in January (I think) where an example of almost every vehicle sold in the U.S. was available for our grubby hands. The Jags were locked tight though :( Anywa
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00342.html (8,754 bytes)

5. RE: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 07:33:01 -0500
Heh...had forgotten about this one of Trevor Boicey's creations, but it was reprinted in the latest issue of MGB Driver which arrived yesterday, and was quite timely for this discussion: http://www.b
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00348.html (7,804 bytes)

6. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Elliott and Martha DeGraff <degraff@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 13:22:26 -0400
Actually, it was aerodynamics that destroyed automotive styling. Elliott DeGraff 271Bs and a 72B /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00366.html (8,149 bytes)

7. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Larry Colen <lrcar@red4est.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:54:54 -0700
Funny, I look at cars and just see the way that styling destroys aerodynamics. Fake vents are among the worst, followed by wings and spoilers that don't add downforce, just drag and turbulence. -- I'
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00369.html (8,135 bytes)

8. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 10:40:34 -0700
So, you think the Aztek is aerodynamic? <g> Aerodynamic efficiency is one thing, plain bad taste is another... -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00371.html (8,498 bytes)

9. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:44:18 -0500
No kidding! And how about the Cadillac Escalade?! Can you say, "Zamboni?" rick /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00373.html (7,910 bytes)

10. Re: more power (but we have styling) (score: 1)
Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:49:59 -0500
While I'd love to drive a Zamboni, you couldn't get me in that monstrosity. -- Paul T. Root E/Mail: proot@iaces.com 600 Stinson Blvd, Fl 1S PAG: +1 (877) 693-7155 Minneapolis, MN 55413 WRK: +1 (612)
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00374.html (8,201 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu