Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*new\s+to\s+list\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 22:34:21 -0700
I don't think they're forgetting SM, but since the original poster drives a CRX he isn't eligible to run SM. More's the pity; SM would be a great place for cars like his to play... Scot '91 CS Miata
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00000.html (6,958 bytes)

2. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 15:18:52 -0500
More precisely: If it's unblown and under 2.0, DM If it's blown and under 1428.57 cc, DM Otherwise, EM. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban LO
/html/autox/2000-07/msg00068.html (6,627 bytes)

3. new to list (score: 1)
Author: Tim Page <toxs@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:28:22 -0300
I am new to the whole solo2 competition. the last time out I was put in the modified catagory with full fledged race cars done to the t's. I havent received my rulebook in the mail yet so i'm wonderi
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02019.html (7,580 bytes)

4. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Mark R Jahnke <mjahnke@students.depaul.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 08:38:26 -0500 (CDT)
Engine swap! Sounds like a car for SM! Maybe I am wrong... Mark R. Jahnke mjahnke@shrike.depaul.edu http://www.geocities.com/riverjahnke/ ICQ: 30406993 AOL IM: mjahnke420 Yahoo Pager: riverjahnke 199
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02020.html (8,015 bytes)

5. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "BPS Administrator" <mhood@busprod.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:12:37 -0500
Sounds like you should be in STS class. If you plan on doing some big engine mods I.E. turbos and head work etc..... look into SM. You can find the sm page here at http://www.wincom.net/trog/stu/inde
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02021.html (8,949 bytes)

6. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Colbert, Raymond J." <Raymond.Colbert@alcoa.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:43:52 -0400
The rear brake upgrade takes it to DM Ray Colbert
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02022.html (8,720 bytes)

7. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Eric Carman <ecarman@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:45:27 -0400
CRX's are not allowed in STS, STR, or SM. Mark, The engine swap is why you were classed in Mod. Sorry, it is great for the drag, but kills you in autocrossing classification.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02023.html (8,805 bytes)

8. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Eric Carman <ecarman@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:47:44 -0400
No it is not, it would be allowed in Street Prepared under the update, backdate rule. It is the engine swap.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02025.html (9,292 bytes)

9. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Mark R Jahnke <mjahnke@students.depaul.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:03:27 -0500 (CDT)
Actually, it's Tim's car, not my car. So what class would he be in then? I know that I have an SM car. Used to be an STU car. Mark R. Jahnke mjahnke@shrike.depaul.edu http://www.geocities.com/riverja
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02029.html (8,314 bytes)

10. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:56:36 -0500
If it's unblown and under 2.0, DM. If it's blown or over 2.0, EM. David Hawkins 93 Mr2 Turbo EM 86 Mr2 CSP in pieces 86 Turbo Cressida EM
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02040.html (8,227 bytes)

11. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:16:21 -0400
are we forgetting SM Street modified was created for just this case Jeff you If it's unblown and under 2.0, DM. If it's blown or over 2.0, EM. David Hawkins 93 Mr2 Turbo EM 86 Mr2 CSP in pieces 86 Tu
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02041.html (8,710 bytes)

12. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:24:14 -0400
oops did not notice CRX sorry Jeff are we forgetting SM Street modified was created for just this case Jeff --Original Message-- From: owner-autox@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-autox@autox.team.net]On
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02042.html (9,225 bytes)

13. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: David A Teague <David.Teague@wcom.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:20:59 -0400
Umm as was said before.. a crx is a two seater.. no two seaters in are we forgetting SM Street modified was created for just this case Jeff you If it's unblown and under 2.0, DM. If it's blown or ove
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02043.html (9,122 bytes)

14. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davek@urjet.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:25:27 -0600
This is a great argument for altering the Street-Mod rules.... Currently the CRX is NOT eligible because it has no rear seat.....
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02044.html (9,667 bytes)

15. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Mark R Jahnke <mjahnke@students.depaul.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:22:05 -0500 (CDT)
That is what I said originally. But then someone posted that CRX's are not allowed in SM. Mark "I have an SM car" Jahnke Mark R. Jahnke mjahnke@shrike.depaul.edu http://www.geocities.com/riverjahnke/
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02045.html (8,733 bytes)

16. RE: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Lloyd" <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:38:43 -0400
It does sound like a really silly rule.. "lets allow almost unlimited mods as long as you have somthing resembling a rear seat, ummm I mean HAD a rear seat because you are allowed to remove them, I m
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02047.html (10,668 bytes)

17. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: reddog_es22@juno.com
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 12:07:59 -0400
Picture this... Heath McMillan's CRX with a SUPERCHARGER! That would be a really tough combination to beat. One of the major premises of SM (the way I've always seen it) is that there are many differ
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02051.html (9,449 bytes)

18. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Kizerian" <davek@urjet.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:12:01 -0600
OK, so building an older Civic Hatchback up with an engine swap and a Super/Turbocharger and it wont become "the car to have"?!?
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02052.html (10,496 bytes)

19. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: Eric Carman <ecarman@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:30:38 -0400
Yes, now someone just needs to do it. I would galdly volunteer to drive it if someone wants to build it. Hehehe.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02058.html (11,055 bytes)

20. Re: new to list (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:57:48 -0400 (EDT)
Of course it will. I just can't believe any of the good csp hatchbacks haven't swapped class letters yet. I guess they could add power too, but I don't think they'd need to... Mark (who certainly is
/html/autox/2000-06/msg02062.html (8,501 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu