Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*not\s+using\s+engine\s+mounts\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*not\s+using\s+engine\s+mounts\.\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. not using engine mounts. (score: 1): Author: "Dunst, Mordecai" <mdunst@smtplink.Coh.ORG>; Date: Mon, 04 Aug 97 10:11:00 pst; I can see several problems with this concept. Is the oil pan now below the frame rails? Mordy I solved this problem with one rather radical solution. I solid mounted my engine in the front. I've had; /html/fot/1997-08/msg00013.html (6,890 bytes)
2. RE: not using engine mounts. (score: 1): Author: Bill Babcock <BillB@bnj.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 11:43:42 -0700; Yes, slightly, but not much. It's almost even. I'm sure if I ran over something nasty the chance of bonking a hole in it would greater, but not much greater. The biggest problem is that engine vibrat; /html/fot/1997-08/msg00014.html (7,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]