Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oil\s+cooler\s+thermostat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oil\s+cooler\s+thermostat\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: "Campsmith, Michael" <MGC4@CDC.GOV>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 07:52:02 -0500; All the traffic lately regarding spin-on oil filter housings (I'm a happy 15+ year user) reminds me that I'm going to install an oil cooler once my body and frame are re-assembled. I live in Atlanta; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00344.html (7,857 bytes)
2. Re: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: <trinitygadget@alltel.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 7:18:56 -0600; Michael--I have run with a Mocal 16-row (?) oil cooler for a few years no without the T-stat. I don't think the T-stat is necessary since at low temps, the oil cooler design is such that the thicker; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00345.html (7,835 bytes)
3. Re: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: Greg Dito <dito9561@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 9:07:57 -0500; I would agree with Rick. I will be installing an oil cooler for my modified engine and do not plan on using a thermostat. The only rationale for this device is to close off the cooler path when the; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00346.html (7,884 bytes)
4. RE: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: "Campsmith, Michael" <MGC4@CDC.GOV>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:49:28 -0500; Thanks to all for your insight regarding the need for a thermostat in my oil cooler lines. The consensus is that it is not necessary, which is what I wanted to hear. Michael; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00347.html (7,428 bytes)
5. Re: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:56:52 -0500 (EST); The thermostat is probably a good idea, as if you run cold 20w50 oil through the cooler when the ambient is cold, the result is like molasses. This will result in parasitic losses in the engine (best; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00348.html (8,864 bytes)
6. Re: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: "Robert M. Lang" <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:06:38 -0500 (EST); I have to disagree with this logic. If the oil is really cold, the oil pressure will be very high - much more than 75 PSI. This high pressure will cause the oil pressure relif valve to dump pressure.; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00349.html (9,150 bytes)
7. Re: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: william mcintire <william.mcintire@wright.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:27:32 -0500; I think it depends on you geographic location. The southern tribes - may - not need a thermostat. If you live where it gets cold, yes, you need one. The oil will continaully circulate through the co; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00351.html (8,373 bytes)
8. RE: oil cooler thermostat (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 08:26:03 -0800; I am not speaking from personal experience here, so please bear with me. I *THOUGHT* that the thermostat was not just for warming up the oil, but also to make sure it didn't get *TOO COOL*. Motor oi; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00353.html (9,568 bytes)
9. Re: Oil Cooler Thermostat (score: 1): Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor); Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:15:05 -0800; Michaie--I would think that running without an oilcooler thermostat would be similar to running without a radiator/water thermostat. Under anything but all-out driving, the fluid(s) would be cooler t; /html/6pack/2004-11/msg00358.html (8,167 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]