- 1. Re: onto fuel (score: 1)
- Author: "alfaki" <alfaki@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 06:10:09 -0500
- Well, I'm not sure whether it's a waste of time or not, unless someone can come up with the max fuel flow possible thru the OEM tank to pump line. However, the 3/8" line from the pump to the carb may
- /html/bricklin/2000-03/msg00033.html (6,777 bytes)
- 2. Fw: onto fuel (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2000 14:57:38 -0500
- Unless you plan on doing some sustained full throttle runs, the large lines and hi perf pump are superfluous since a daily driver normally only needs 0.5*HP/6lbs, or ~27GPH. Well within an OEM system
- /html/bricklin/2000-03/msg00041.html (8,324 bytes)
- 3. Re: onto fuel (score: 1)
- Author: "alfaki" <alfaki@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 08:30:46 -0500
- Yes, I agree. But in keeping with the design concept of the performance mods, the elec fuel pump was dismissed. Hell, I could've gone with fuel injection or a big block. But what I wanted to acheive
- /html/bricklin/2000-03/msg00052.html (10,552 bytes)
- 4. Fw: onto fuel (score: 1)
- Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 12:25:23 -0500
- You'd be surprised. You probably won't notice it in the seat-of-the pants, but it's obvious when comparing pink slips. Like you say, for street use it's more a personal thing. As a period conversion,
- /html/bricklin/2000-03/msg00055.html (6,842 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu