Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*overriders\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. overriders (score: 1)
Author: "J. Robert Kelchner" <jrk8@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 15:48:25 -0400 (EDT)
Asked this question before but no replies. For anyone having a "B" with chrome overriders, would like to know if the ones on front point straight ahead, or do they "toe out" due to the curvature of t
/html/mgs/1996-10/msg00957.html (6,785 bytes)

2. RE: overriders (score: 1)
Author: Randy Rees <randyr@starwave.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 13:25:37 -0700
looked at mine and it seems they have a gentle curve towards the body on the front (convex side)and straight up and down on the back (concaved side)
/html/mgs/1996-10/msg00959.html (7,288 bytes)

3. Re: overriders (score: 1)
Author: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 18:19:18 -0400 (EDT)
My info suggests there were a couple of years with left/right overriders, so that they point straight ahead. Later chrome and rubber-tipped chrome were one part number, and so point slightly to the o
/html/mgs/1996-10/msg00969.html (7,564 bytes)

4. Re: overriders (score: 1)
Author: "craig wiper" <craigw@sonic.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 18:20:41 -0700
I replaced the rubber overriders and chrome bumpers on my '74 B with bumpers and overriders from a 1969 B. They are tangent to the radius of the bumper. Or, they follow the curve and do not point str
/html/mgs/1996-10/msg00980.html (7,434 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu