Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*packaway\s+to\s+folding\s+conv\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*packaway\s+to\s+folding\s+conv\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 12:41:23 -0700; Yes, but what about the entertainment value provided for onlookers when a sudden downpour causes the driver and passenger to hop out and attempt to erect the top in traffic at a stoplight before the; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00030.html (8,373 bytes)
2. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Dave Quirt <quirt@sk.sympatico.ca>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 14:35:01 -0600; Skye and others: Having had numerous Bs over the years, ranging from my current '62 (yeah - IMHO) to a RB '75 (boo - IMHO), I have to say that I prefer the '71/'72-on black folding frame top with the; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00036.html (7,510 bytes)
3. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 20:22:37 -0500; Hi Dave, I'll agree with that. When my present top wears out (1 yr old) I'm going to get one of the black folding frames and a zippered top. The gray folder I now have is a PITA. CR '69 B; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00079.html (6,805 bytes)
4. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>; Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 19:40:17 -0700; Nahhh I like it rugged! Skye; /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00127.html (6,749 bytes)
5. packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 14:00:23 -0700; I'm thinking about searching out an early folding hood frame (the kind with the levers - not the later michelotti type) to replace the packaway frame I currently have on my '66. I was wondering what; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01860.html (7,343 bytes)
6. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 20:40:52 -0700; Hmmm, I think I read somewhere that "the hood is completely different and not interchangeable" or words to that effect. For one thing, I can't see how your packaway hood would attach to the rear cowl; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01885.html (9,050 bytes)
7. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 15:18:56 -0700; The folding hood as I understand it is very similar to the packaway; you still have to attach the rear bar to the tonneau panel, do all the lift the dots, etc. You still have to roll it up to put it; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01928.html (8,418 bytes)
8. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 18:51:51 -0400; (major snip here) <Hey at least I don't have an MGA! My most heartfelt sympathy is sent your way. Bill; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01929.html (6,912 bytes)
9. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: "Dan Ray" <danray@bluegrass.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 19:29:26 -0500; Hey Skye!...If you wanted all the "luxuries" and chrome bumpers (without the funky grill and split bumper) you should have gotten a '73 like I did! ;) Dan 73 B; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01930.html (7,305 bytes)
10. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: Eric Erickson <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 11:08:10 +0000; I love my fold-down top! I have seen the "pack-away" users standing in the rain trying to put the top up, whereas I can just stop at a set of traffic lights and have the top up before they turn green; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01939.html (7,514 bytes)
11. Re: packaway to folding conv (score: 1): Author: BDurgin1@aol.com; Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 00:46:22 EDT; << The consensus seems to be that the early type of folding frame is not one of England's finest creations, and not only that but the top for it (which is different) is hard to source. >> I have the; /html/mgs/1999-04/msg01952.html (7,279 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]