Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*paddock\s+police\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*paddock\s+police\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. paddock police (score: 1): Author: Alek Tziortzis <alextz@comm.mot.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:15:32 -0500; I have a suggestion, When I showed up at noon on the friday before the pro, I was really pissed to find out that every damn space for the first 6-7 rows was "reserved" by someone who wasnt even ther; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00203.html (8,807 bytes)
2. RE: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:02:09 -0500; Thats not fair. == Uh oh, he used the "F" word. ;^) Unfortunately, no single plan will please everybody, but if we can minimize the amount of unhappy folks the plan will be a success. A few ticked of; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00204.html (7,738 bytes)
3. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 13:00:12 -0500; Second the motion. Row 1 is Chief's Row. Some spillover to Row 2 as necessary. (And Row 1 Slot 1 [#101?] is the Paddock Police HQ) All other spaces Rows 2-5 are claimed on a first-come basis, must be; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00211.html (10,519 bytes)
4. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:06:34 -0400; You know, I have to agree with Alek on this one. I think a preference can and should be given to those that are competing in the ProFinale to the 'Front' rows. It is absolutely ridiculous for someone; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00212.html (10,543 bytes)
5. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:02:24 EDT; Can the SEB get some priority, too? We're going to be spending a lot of time in impound looking at cars this year, and it would be nice to not be in the back 40... Charlie /// unsubscribe/change addr; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00266.html (7,334 bytes)
6. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Rick Cone" <rickcone@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 09:59:34 -0400; I'll bite... And just what will we be looking at/for Charlie? time the try /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Par; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00268.html (8,358 bytes)
7. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hardy" <dave2020@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:40:03 -0400; Yeah, and the Advisory Committees... Dave Hardy, SMAC 89 SM DILYSI Motorsports - Drive It Like You Stole It! time the; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00286.html (7,491 bytes)
8. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 01:55:14 EDT; Mostly comparing preparation levels. There has been a lot of discussion regarding directions the P and M categories should go, and we need to look closely at the carsthat are actually competing. CHD; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00288.html (7,556 bytes)
9. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: Andrew Schmiechen <aschmiechen@discovercolor.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:17:45 -0500; Yeah....and STS too? -A. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00290.html (9,379 bytes)
10. Re: paddock police (score: 1): Author: "Wally Strzelec" <Wally@Tamu.edu>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:33:13 -0500; Something that I thought of this morning, don't know if it would work but thought I would throw it out there..... Assign all of the priority folks to the first row or two. After that look at last yea; /html/autox/2002-06/msg00339.html (12,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]