Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*powdercoating\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*powdercoating\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. powdercoating (score: 1): Author: LGMCAFEE@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:13:20 EDT; I bought a cheap system and have been powdercoating a few small items and heating them an old electric oven and they have been coming out looking good. Last night I let a rag with some lacquer thinne; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00045.html (7,408 bytes)
2. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 07:28:12 -0500; Larry you could have laid nuclear waste on my chassis and it wouldn't have touched the damn power coat... But like you I can see a place for it in the small parts department.. good. the this product; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00046.html (8,046 bytes)
3. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: Auburn Design Group <foxriverkid@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT); Now I'm confused. Keith, do you see a place for powdercoating small parts with a system that obviously doesn't work? What difference does the size of the part make? Other than in double Blink Blink?; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00047.html (8,729 bytes)
4. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:16:37 -0500; I don't think setting in lacquer thinner qualify's this as Bad power What I know about the junk is that it sticks like mad... and is a real pain in the butt to get off... that has merit in it's rust; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00048.html (8,397 bytes)
5. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "jkamo" <jkamo@rushmore.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:07:19 -0600; I clean my powder coated parts in solvents of many types, it is unfazed, something is not right if lacquer thinner bothers it Joe :) -- Original Message -- From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net> To: "Aub; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00049.html (9,076 bytes)
6. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 14:33:11 +0000; powDer coat Keith.. it's fucking POWDER, not power! By the way... I use a high heat VHT on all kinds of stuff and bake it in my welding oven(from cylinders to heads to small brackets and such, steel,; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00050.html (8,508 bytes)
7. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Ed Van Scoy" <lsr128@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 09:45:55 -0700; I was browsing thru my Eastwood catalog the other day, and cane across liquid powder coat remover....... Prolly not half as much fun as eating sand for a week ;-) Ed and made though; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00051.html (9,038 bytes)
8. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 10:59:49 -0700 (PDT); "powDer coat Keith.. it's fucking POWDER, not power!" Do you feel it is really necessary to use this kind of language to express yourself...If so I feel sorry for you! Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/CC; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00052.html (7,784 bytes)
9. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 13:25:46 -0500; Thanks Tom.... Todd is a good friend and that's actually how we would most likely converse in person.... but your right here... it's kinda rough for our general readership... I've obviously not minde; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00053.html (8,196 bytes)
10. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: LGMCAFEE@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 14:41:56 EDT; In a message dated 5/5/2004 8:25:07 AM Central Standard Time, wester6935@comcast.net writes: Are you sure they were clean before you did the powdercoating? From what I've learned at two facilities an; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00054.html (8,440 bytes)
11. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 15:21:15 -0700 (PDT); It wasn't my desire to belittle Todd, or anyone else...I just think that, although this is the type of language that is popular among many, in my opinion it doesn't add anything of worth to the messa; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00056.html (8,064 bytes)
12. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: DaCudaKid@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 18:50:15 EDT; OK, I've been away for a while... so what happened when they used it on your Mike in L.A.; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00057.html (7,700 bytes)
13. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 20:06:58 -0500; Mike this is on the new race car... they had done the chassis in it and I removed it over the last couple of months... you can see the car on speedweek's photo's last year and on the www.ecta-lsr.com; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00060.html (7,569 bytes)
14. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:19:26 +0000; My apologies to KT and those offended on the list for that making it on here, it was truly meant to be a private message to between him and I only and I must have accidently hit the "reply all" butto; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00061.html (8,254 bytes)
15. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 07:01:20 -0700 (PDT); Todd & List, I don't apologize for my stance on this...I put this qoute back on the list to alert others to my feelings on the use of the network (it came from the network). If I were to bring in my; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00063.html (7,909 bytes)
16. Re: powdercoating (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:49:39 EDT; I'm very elegant always! Jack; /html/land-speed/2004-05/msg00067.html (7,142 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]