- 1. Re: rack types (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:38:15 EST
- Yes--the old style is beefier, quicker, and in my opinion much better-made. The later style has thinner tie rods, and everything just seems to be lighter. If you go from one to the other, though , yo
- /html/spridgets/2004-03/msg00004.html (6,691 bytes)
- 2. Re: rack types (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 07:09:04 -0500 (EST)
- I want to say when they switich over to the Spitfire 1500 they changed over to the Spit rack as well but I'm not all that sure the two coincided. If I recall, the Spit rack began in '76 but I could
- /html/spridgets/2004-03/msg00005.html (6,593 bytes)
- 3. Re: rack types (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:48:38 -0600
- Don't say it, Cap'n! Horler indicates that it was February of 1972 that the change occurred. All of my RWAs have the Spit rack. David Lieb
- /html/spridgets/2004-03/msg00008.html (7,029 bytes)
- 4. Re: rack types (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 04:39:10 -0800
- Which is about the time that the Spit 1500 was introduced to the US, so he's partially right. Non-North American Spits got the 1500 engine the same time the Midgets did, about 1975. -=Chris <--Origin
- /html/spridgets/2004-03/msg00009.html (7,358 bytes)
- 5. rack types (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:48:24 EST
- A quick question, --are there two types of steering racks and are they visually different? I"m off to the junk yard this week.TIA. Bob C
- /html/spridgets/2004-02/msg01156.html (6,046 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu