Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*radar\s+detector\s+recommendations\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*radar\s+detector\s+recommendations\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Nandaholz@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:15:31 EST; I got a lame ticket two minutes into my commute home yesturday on Great America Parkway...55 in a 40. I pulled out in front of traffic and was tagged by radar..it was not a sustained 55 speed more li; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00001.html (8,430 bytes)
2. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Sethracer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:45:38 EST; << Also what happens if you get pulled over with one stuck on you wind shield...isn't it just a little to obvious...can they site you for having a detector. He also got me for not have a front plate,; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00002.html (8,373 bytes)
3. RE: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: "Smith, Corey" <Corey.Smith@kla-tencor.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 10:08:29 -0800; Yup, Seth's right, radar detectors are legal in CA. I had a Passport several years ago that I was pretty happy with. It did a pretty good job at detecting radar, and it did not have laser protection.; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00003.html (9,650 bytes)
4. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Enno Wein <enno@lsil.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:08:19 -0800; I have used a Bell 560i or so since more than 2 years. Yes - it has saved me from a number of potential tickets, but its real value is different: It keeps me on my toes with its frequent, undetermini; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00004.html (7,992 bytes)
5. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Derek Butts <pnc1@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 10:15:50 -0800; If its false signals that you want I have the radar detector for you. My four old Whistler with laser goes off so many times that you become immune to its sound. I recently purchased the top of the l; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00005.html (8,815 bytes)
6. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Enno Wein <enno@lsil.com>; Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2000 11:00:30 -0800; I don't WANT false alarms, I am just saying that it's a fair tradeoff - the protection part enables you to do some of the bad thing, where the false alarm part causes you to do more of the good thin; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00008.html (7,686 bytes)
7. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 16:23:52 EST; << I don't WANT false alarms, I am just saying that it's a fair tradeoff - the protection part enables you to do some of the bad thing, where the false alarm part causes you to do more of the good th; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00013.html (7,728 bytes)
8. Re: radar detector recommendations (score: 1): Author: "Brad Martinson" <brad@rahul.net>; Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 13:31:16 -0800; wont He what? Since when does the CHP / SJPD have any bizness under your hood!? Would he have added another citation for an illegal intake manifold, if you had one? Or, "show me the CARB exemption f; /html/ba-autox/2000-03/msg00015.html (7,561 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]