- 1. re Fiero reclassing (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Morency" <DMorency@gwi.net>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 18:41:34 -0400
- Please reread my post! I have no problem racing MR2's! This is the issue. Fiero's all look pretty much the same but are vastly different from 1984-7 to 1988. An 88 has a much better and totally diffe
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg00893.html (8,508 bytes)
- 2. re fiero reclassing (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Morency" <DMorency@gwi.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 09:23:37 -0400
- I didn't expect to create such an uproar. My initial issue with my CS Fiero vs was not reclassing it. DS CS who cares? I run about the same times as our clubs D stock times. Course dependence is obv
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01076.html (9,001 bytes)
- 3. Re: re fiero reclassing (score: 1)
- Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:55:27 -0500
- to Several people have found fault with this logic and provided very good reasons that the car belongs in CS. I'm one of the people who feels it was a good move even if you skip demographics. 1.8 Tr
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01080.html (9,282 bytes)
- 4. Re: re fiero reclassing (score: 1)
- Author: "Dan Morency" <DMorency@gwi.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:58:15 -0400
- David, Can you read? I clearly stated that I have no problem with the V6 in CS! I have problems with the flawed logic from Mr. Bettencourt that states why the 1.6 Miata was moved, simple. He just res
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01111.html (12,052 bytes)
- 5. Re: re fiero reclassing (score: 1)
- Author: "Scot Zediker" <roadsterboy@earthlink.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:21:36 -0700
- 1.8 <sarcasm ON> I'd LOVE to find out where I can get one of those 130hp 1.6L Miatas. Mine's missing about 14hp or so. <sarcasm OFF> The correct figure is 116hp/105 lb-ft for a 1.6L Miata. 1.8L Miata
- /html/autox/2000-07/msg01149.html (8,222 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu