Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+steer\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+steer\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. rear steer (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 07:12:49 -0600; an actual rear steer vehicle for sale..... John Robinson, Mechanician Mechanical Engineering University of Wisconsin 1513 University Ave. Madison, Wi. 53706 608-262-3606 Current World Land Speed Rec; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00065.html (7,041 bytes)
2. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:29:17 -0800; I'm sure Franklin will be surely bidding the last seconds for this sought item. I can see the propeller being added as I write this note. J.D. -- Original Message -- From: "john robinson" <john@engr.; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00072.html (7,053 bytes)
3. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:38:34 -0800; Maybe a beanie hat Glen -- Original Message -- From: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net> To: "john robinson" <john@engr.wisc.edu>; <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:29; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00079.html (7,362 bytes)
4. RE: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:55:53 -0600; I won't bid against him-- those tires aren't wide enough for me. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ I'm sure Franklin will be surely bidding the last seconds for this sought item. I can see the propeller bein; /html/land-speed/2004-01/msg00081.html (7,369 bytes)
5. re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Bob B <saltracer@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 16:37:26 -0700; I have watched this thread and it seems to be a guessing game so now we have something I can do -- guess. 40+ years ago I drove a fork lift that could carry 10 tons and we used to run around the prop; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00021.html (6,946 bytes)
6. Rear Steer (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:30:18 -0700; It doesn't make any difference how you feel about or whether you want to try it or not. BUT rear steer is not allowed at any land speed sanctioned event by the SCTA or BNI by the definition of an Aut; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00536.html (7,533 bytes)
7. Re: Rear Steer (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 19:31:26 -0700; And so by that definition change is never allowed. All progress is halted. You know I saw a one wheeled "motor cycle" run a couple of years ago...how did that fit in the book? The point is not to be; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00544.html (8,527 bytes)
8. rear steer (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:50:09 -0500; gotta get my oar in.....rear steer yahhoooo! somebody want to quote me the rule that says rear steer not allowed? my rule book is at home....ping me at my email, as I get the digest I also think its; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00591.html (8,577 bytes)
9. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:26:11 EDT; << .ping me at my email, as I get the digest I also think its driver rather than car. it has been done before >> One phase of my prototype I designed understeer instead of the inherent oversteer,and; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00608.html (7,772 bytes)
10. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 18:38:20 -0600; yeah, thrust SSC used it, what a failure only reached Mach 1, and NO mishaps so if I get this right, it works great for low speed and high speed forklifts, and worked at Mach 1, but it cant work for; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00614.html (8,078 bytes)
11. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 07:48:40 -0700; Page 35 sec.4D Automible, steering must be assured by at least two front wheels and propelled by at least two wheels. Lots of things look good on paper and some actually work. Rear steer hasn't been; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00620.html (7,733 bytes)
12. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 07:34:12 -0500; where were you sitting in that prototype? how far from the front wheels? how far from the rear wheels? what was the vehicle weight? how much weight on the front wheels? on the rear? did you still hav; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00624.html (8,906 bytes)
13. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:49:11 EDT; << I'll bet me and mayf would like to see pics....video would be even better.... >> Small proto in 1989 with tandem adjustable 12" dia. tyres. It was never usable but I learned a lot and I would feel; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00628.html (7,911 bytes)
14. rear steer (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:10:37 -0500; the figures for the dymaxion car were not tested numbers,they were, to the best of the my readings on the car, "best guess and advertising numbers", I thought the top speed somebody wrote about was 9; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00691.html (9,027 bytes)
15. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:14:14 EDT; John My tests show use rake & trail not caster camber. On a rectangular wheel lay out, by imposing " understeer" the rear steer "feel" is eliminated. Noble used spindles and tried to stabilize it wit; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00715.html (7,708 bytes)
16. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:58:55 -0500; well, I have been thinking of using a tandem rear wheel setup, yes I know this is not favorable, but the idea was to narrow the rear of the vehicle ala summers bros tadpole, and maintain a fairly sho; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00717.html (9,613 bytes)
17. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:16:36 -0700; Jack, exactly. But rake and trail are the same as large amounts of caster. Think of the bike's steering head as the kingpin . It intersects the surface way ahead of the contact patch on the tire. I w; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00719.html (8,277 bytes)
18. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:45:13 EDT; I also planned my 1st liner that way. I made a rolling test bed with adjustable rake and trail. I found the most stable was 30deg. rearward rake and 0deg. trail. With a long WB and slow steering it m; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00722.html (7,650 bytes)
19. RE: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:06:01 -0500; I'm thinking along similar lines, for bikes. Whether lsr bike-- or car-- "rake" doesn't seem to matter a whole lot. But lots of "trail" should help stability, in any case. Typically, trail is increa; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00725.html (8,688 bytes)
20. Re: rear steer (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:27:58 -0700; Russ, you are not going to believe this but one of the technical papers I surfed onto had an active rear steer for a bike! mayf -- Original Message -- From: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net> To:; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00729.html (9,060 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]