Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bar\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bar\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. rear sway bar.... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:39:24 -0800; Hello spridgets, as far as "theory" goes..... a front sway bar is cure oversteer, a rear sway bar for understeer. (loose, or tight respectively for the NASCARites).... since spritgets tend toward ove; /html/spridgets/2004-12/msg00597.html (7,176 bytes)
2. Re: rear sway bar.... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 23:21:53 -0500 5.0; U); Well, more of the theory suggests that by adding the thicker bar up front, then compensating with a lighter bar in the back, you now have bars at each end attempting to eliminate the lean. (changes t; /html/spridgets/2004-12/msg00598.html (7,695 bytes)
3. Re: rear sway bar.... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 22:27:55 -0600 reply-type=original with any abuse report; I won't pretend to have tried all of the combinations, but I will say that I was hard pressed to tell the difference when I put a stock 9/16" sway on the front of My Midget that had none. OTOH, when; /html/spridgets/2004-12/msg00599.html (6,895 bytes)
4. Re: rear sway bar.... (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 20:49:18 -0800 reply-type=original; The message from Bill is correct in theory, it all depends on what handling charicteristics you are trying to acheive from your car, as well as what other changes are made. With no front sway bar, s; /html/spridgets/2004-12/msg00600.html (9,496 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]