Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rear\s+sway\s+bar\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: Larry Vaughan <ljvaughan@pldi.net>; Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:31:20 -0600; Has anyone used a rear sway bar on their swing spring Spitfire. I see them advertized but can't recall any discussions about them. The Spitfire rear may be unsuited for one. The ones I've seen may ha; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00040.html (7,336 bytes)
2. RE: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard" <r.gosling@penspen.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:34:34 -0000; As I understand it, the whole point of changing from the fixed spring to the swing spring is, effectively, to remove almost all roll stiffness from the rear suspension (the lowest leaf, which remain; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00043.html (8,392 bytes)
3. RE: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: M D Nugent <carcentric@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:41:23 -0800 (PST); My interpretation is that the swing spring was implemented to minimize the deadly (literally) inside wheel tuck under in high-G corners. Adding a rear swaybar shouldn't undo that, and it will result; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00044.html (8,366 bytes)
4. RE: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard" <r.gosling@penspen.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:48:32 -0000; Doc, Larry, and all - Yes, the swing spring was implemented to minimise the inside wheel tuck. But how did it achieve this? Think about the difference in the systems - the fixed spring resists both w; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00045.html (10,180 bytes)
5. Re: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: Tburke4@aol.com; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:44:04 EST; God forbid I should offer myself as a suspension expert (all I know is how to get filthy working on them). But, I do recall a discussion long ago on the list about rear sway bars. My recollection is; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00046.html (10,688 bytes)
6. RE: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: "Gosling, Richard" <r.gosling@penspen.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:46:08 -0000; Should have known you'd chime in on this one! You suggest "...it will have another more positive effect. since the wheel tuck only becomes a problem when the unloaded wheel is allowed to drop and su; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00047.html (9,687 bytes)
7. Re: rear sway bar (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:27:45 -0700; Perhaps my "will" should have been "may". I did not mean to impose any definate characterization of what will happen only to suggest that it is possible. Since I have little experience with the swin; /html/spitfires/2006-02/msg00048.html (10,456 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]