Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ref\s+80\'s\s+Jag\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ref\s+80\'s\s+Jag\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. ref 80's Jag (score: 1): Author: Carl French <leylandauto@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 19:05:53 -0800 (PST); I just got an 84 XJ given to me that looks driveable with a small bit of work (sat for 1.5 years). I am looking for similar thoughts also. Carl William Killeffer <wkilleffer@comcast.net> wrote: Hello; /html/mgs/2003-12/msg00275.html (6,954 bytes)
2. Re: ref 80's Jag (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <rolindsay@stoolhead.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 8:47:14 -0500; Guys, I have owned Jags of many species (an XJ6, multiple XJ-S, the old S-type, an E-type plus I have worked on many others. They are fine cars but they are BBCs (that like LBCs but BIG). Like our LB; /html/mgs/2003-12/msg00278.html (7,562 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]