Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*repair\,rebuild\,restore\,64B\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*repair\,rebuild\,restore\,64B\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. repair,rebuild,restore,64B? (score: 1): Author: "WESLEY SMITH" <wes-smith@msn.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:32:30 -0800; Hi All Looking for, as always, words of wisdom from the list. I removed engine and transmission from 64B, bought last fall, to rebuild transmission. Engine runs well compression good. No other histor; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00530.html (7,526 bytes)
2. Re: repair,rebuild,restore,64B? (score: 1): Author: Mgbbob@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:00:58 -0500; Hi Wes, If compression is good and it doesn't smoke, I would drive it for now. The early 3 main (GA) engines tended to wind up quicker (less inertia in the crank) but aren't as robust as the 5 main (; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00539.html (7,308 bytes)
3. Re: repair,rebuild,restore,64B? (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:40:54 EST; << I removed engine and transmission from 64B, bought last fall, to rebuild transmission. Engine runs well compression good. No other history on engine. I have heard the 3 main bearing engines don't; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00543.html (7,618 bytes)
4. Re: repair,rebuild,restore,64B? (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:05:44 -0800; My understanding is that the change from 3 to 5 main bearings was for reasons of crank stiffness under extreme loads, not for longevity, so I wouldn't worry about that in particular. That said, the b; /html/mgs/2003-02/msg00554.html (8,492 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]