Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rule\s+changes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rule\s+changes\s*$/: 41 ]

Total 41 documents matching your query.

1. Rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 05:43:20 -0700; OK so how do I input my request for rules changes in MPS? what format? where/who to mail? ** Page 12 Dan Warner; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00311.html (6,428 bytes)
2. Rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 08:53:45 -0700; What is the format for proposing a formal change? Who gets to vote? MPS-G has been talked about for the two years that I've been involved with the sport and hopefully it will be voted on and resolved; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00320.html (8,057 bytes)
3. Re: Rule changes (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 15:40:48 EDT; << Page 12 Dan Warner >> Kinda neat when Dan just answers with a page number huh? Mike :); /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00333.html (6,474 bytes)
4. rule changes (score: 1): Author: "gary baker" <lsr350@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:46:45 +1000; Im just back from a DLRA meeting , as you may know we use the SCTA rules in full with a few exceptions and a few added Aussie rules I am tring to have the rules for partial streamlineing for motorcy; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00456.html (8,609 bytes)
5. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: Sparky <wmtsmith@landracing.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 5:01:38 -0500; Gary,,I think you have probably answered your own question--you most likely can go faster--wmts "Sparky" Lakester 2211 /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// h; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00457.html (9,349 bytes)
6. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:25:41 -0500; Good question, Gary. I'd like to know the answer, too. The SCTA rules for partial streamlined/ modified bike have become so friggin conservative that some sportbikes with STOCK bodywork can't pass (l; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00462.html (8,990 bytes)
7. FW: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Dana" <dana@goulston.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:55:30 -0700; I'm afraid politics and special interests have played a part. I have never been able to get ANY answer as to why Modified Frame was killed at El Mirage. During my last investigation re. bike length,; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00468.html (9,708 bytes)
8. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:27:59 -0700; Check with Wink winkscycles@aaol.com some of the motorcycle rules have been returned (reinstated) to the 2002 rule book. This was done at the last SCTA meeting. Phone ois 909-694-8570 Glen -- Origin; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00470.html (10,929 bytes)
9. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 18:56:34 -0600; Well I can tell you the reason for the rule. This creates more of a surface area, thus wind gusts can push you over. It is a safety factor in enclosing rear wheel and adding more surface area. That i; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00481.html (9,999 bytes)
10. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: Ed Van Scoy <ed@vetteracing.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:23:09 -0700; Interesting reason, but as a street bike rider, I can understand it. I have a friend that bought a new Indian Chief with the huge retro front fender, and he complained often about getting blown all; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00483.html (11,036 bytes)
11. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Jim Belford" <jimbelford@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 22:19:11 -0600; Jonathan, I can understand your reasoning about the safety (or lack of) when fully enclosing the rear wheel but I do not see the issue with 1-2" of the stock seat support fairing extending beyond the; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00486.html (10,980 bytes)
12. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:57:47 -0500; My response to Jon may have suggested that I don't think bodywork and unvented wheels can be a sidewind problem. I DO know that can be a serious problem-- I just think it is not a reasonable explana; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00488.html (9,716 bytes)
13. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:25:26 -0700; Another interesting bit of trivia ... when Joe Paterelli (sp?) set his speed record in the 30's on the Knucklehead on the beach, he did it without the tail section fitted, as he reported poor handlin; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00498.html (10,513 bytes)
14. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:08:57 -0500; your perspective on the sidewind problem (resultant wind vector, airfoil angle-of-attack) may be very insightful, and very useful-- especially for streamliners. If there is not a flaw in this idea s; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00500.html (9,939 bytes)
15. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:27:04 -0500; So Jon's last-year bodywork wasn't stock, after all. Well, shoot-- what do I know about Kawis, anyway? Nevermind. Russ, #1226B Hey, it's my turn -- you guys are talking about my bike, so maybe I shou; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00501.html (10,370 bytes)
16. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:48:49 -0500; Adding those skirted front fenders also moves the aerodynamic "center of pressure" forward-- just what you don't want! Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ Jon; Interesting reason, but as a street bike rider, I; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00502.html (10,785 bytes)
17. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: Ed Van Scoy <ed@vetteracing.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:59:51 -0700; Yes, Wes reminded me of that fact last night off-list. Petrali (or Harley) just used the body-work for photo sessions. As for "Fat Boy" I don't have time to answer now, but one more clue: The name IS; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00505.html (11,138 bytes)
18. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: FastmetalBDF@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 21:04:01 EDT; Ed ....... Might you be referring to the A-Bomb " Fat Boy " dropped from the Enola Gay, whose crew trained at Wendover during the war years ? When in Wendover, you " newbies" might take time to see t; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00525.html (9,311 bytes)
19. RE: rule changes (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:08:43 -0500; I thought the two bombs were named "Little Boy" and "Fat Man" --Original Message-- From: FastmetalBDF@aol.com [mailto:FastmetalBDF@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 8:04 PM To: ed@vetteracing.com; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00527.html (9,847 bytes)
20. Re: rule changes (score: 1): Author: Ed Van Scoy <ed@vetteracing.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:06:00 -0700; J.D., You are smarter than you look ;-) -- Original message -- <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com> <lsr350@hotmail.com>, <land-speed@autox.team.net> Fat Boy " the war years ? the monument it tell the two o; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00528.html (10,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]