Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rules\s*$/: 84 ]

Total 84 documents matching your query.

1. Rules (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:41:22 -0800 (PST); Are SA95 helmets still legal or are SA2000 now required? Dick J in East Texas (where it reached 80 degrees today!) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yah; /html/land-speed/2005-01/msg00439.html (6,269 bytes)
2. rules (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 05:51:07 -0700; and everybody else involved in making this sport happen. I want you guys to know that there's at least one racer out here who really appreciates all the hard work you guys have to go through to make; /html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00141.html (6,861 bytes)
3. Re: Rules (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 05:34:28 -0700; I'm glad to hear you are recovering well. SCTA/BNI does not have a class for the Circle Track, /CT cars. That is a ECTA specific class. I am sure John can answer your question. Dan /// /// land-spee; /html/land-speed/2001-05/msg00522.html (7,431 bytes)
4. Rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 07:20:55 -0500; It has been said that there is a rules meeting in Jan. What do I have to do to bring up a rules change for the Wankel(aka rotary) engine size factor for serious discussion? It has been e-mailed to de; /html/land-speed/2001-01/msg00084.html (8,407 bytes)
5. rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 06:06:27 -0500; Mike is there anyway to revisit the Mazda rotary ruling about displacement calculation this year. I really am disappointed on the ruling to just leave it alone at displacement X3 when SCCA and FIA ha; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00344.html (9,120 bytes)
6. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:24:48 -0500; Well in my humble opinion I think it is entirely fair to compare engines on the basis of how many cubic inches of volume they process over a given number or crankshaft rotations.. It's all physics an; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00350.html (9,162 bytes)
7. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:41:15 -0800; I don't know Dave, the Bonneville record book shows 21 F class records set in 1990 or later and 10 older than 1990. That shows some interest. How many people out there want to run rotary's? Jim in Pa; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00355.html (10,029 bytes)
8. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:51:46 -0700; Im not sure why it is important to know who out there right NOW has interest in running rotaries, or what the existing history of records shows. It (to me anyway) is much more important to have fair; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00357.html (11,303 bytes)
9. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:35:09 -0500; What the heck does how many people want to run them have anything to do with anything?? You have completely lost me with the business as usual nonsense.... In many respects it is a matter of credibil; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00358.html (12,149 bytes)
10. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:14:37 -0800; Gee guys don't get hostile I was just asking for my own edification, I have no axe to grind either way. It does seen that you are arguing from both ends of the same log here though. If going back to; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00359.html (14,065 bytes)
11. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:48:24 EST; The only rule that bothers me is the one that rules me out of existence. Nebulous Theorem; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00360.html (7,445 bytes)
12. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:28:01 -0700; Jim respectully in response to: """If going back to doing records runs "the way we always did it" is good how come leaving the engine classes "the way we always did it " is bad.""" and """Saying that; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00361.html (15,960 bytes)
13. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 07:15:38 -0500; I hate to sound hostile but things based on opinion rather than fact generally make me that way. I am an engineer I deal with facts make all decisions based on facts! anything that starts with 'the w; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00367.html (17,050 bytes)
14. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 07:16:18 -0800; I guess I didn't make my point very well. In the Pro-Comp class the NHRA was (and still is in Top Alcohol) unable to fix parity between engines while having access to reams of scientifically accurate; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00375.html (7,718 bytes)
15. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 10:59:02 EST; I will gladly put rules in the hands of the board, A group of volunteers who make it happen for the rest of us, pretty darn effectively I might add! Jack; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00382.html (7,513 bytes)
16. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:01:00 -0500; Then i did not make mine( point) very well either and will try again. NHRA was trying to fix the difference in breathing and ultimate HP from each engine. They were not trying, to my knowledge, to do; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00384.html (8,646 bytes)
17. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 09:42:45 -0800; Dave; Last year Ardun Doug, Bill Carlson and I tried to get the X and XX class breaks changed from the current 325 and below and 325 to 375 inch to the same as all the other classes with C,D,E and F; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00389.html (9,447 bytes)
18. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 12:46:54 -0500; I suspect you are right...; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00390.html (9,692 bytes)
19. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:45:54 EST; Rich--My Hurricane would have a better chance that way, right? Jack; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00397.html (7,119 bytes)
20. Re: rules (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 13:47:46 -0800; Jack; Right and any other vintage engine of smaller cubic inches. 325 was a very large engine in 48. If some one wants to run a Chevy or other of the more common engines. he's in trouble. The reason; /html/land-speed/2000-12/msg00399.html (7,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]