Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*run\s+groups\s+for\s+Boondoggle\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*run\s+groups\s+for\s+Boondoggle\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "Don L." <toy4speed@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 21:27:02 -0800 (PST); I'm having trouble getting the run groups for Boondoggle to display. Anybody have the run/class schedule to share? Thanks! Don Lew Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00021.html (7,486 bytes)
2. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 22:10:37 -0800; Eek, what a time for a web glitch! Fortunately the schedule I posted on baautox.com is still up there: Round 1 (Boondoggle) at Oakland Coliseum work/run schedule 6 run groups, 3 morning/3 afternoon:; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00022.html (8,262 bytes)
3. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:49:20 -0500; While I realize the 6-run group system is new, I find the system to be less than sensational as it appears to require people to work as long as two hours. The orignal 8-group system required a singl; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00038.html (8,468 bytes)
4. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: james creasy <jcreasy@perforce.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:12:01 -0800; i agree wholeheartedly with mr kelly. work groups are really long. working right after driving wasnt fun either, as driving is actually kind of exhausting, and id like a break before standing for two; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00039.html (9,173 bytes)
5. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:15:57 -0800; Are you addressing me because I posted the run group schedule when Don Lew couldn't find it on the web site? Don McKenna's proposal for a 6-group format was not based on problems in the Slush season.; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00040.html (9,019 bytes)
6. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:15:30 EST; I'm in agreement that Boondoggle was not a good event to "beta test" a 6 run group format...particularly with the added complication of our new registration system!! Oh well, maybe its better to take; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00041.html (7,994 bytes)
7. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: Viet-Tam Luu <viettamluu@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 14:29:58 -0800; I think Boondoggle--with the extra load of snafus related to the new registration/scoring system--constituted something close to the worst-case scenario for the 6-run-group format. And nobody died, n; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00043.html (8,547 bytes)
8. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: Katie Kelly <aceontour@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:19:45 -0800 (PST); With any luck, maybe they'll decrease so much that six run groups make sense. :) -Katie; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00044.html (7,979 bytes)
9. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 19:08:35 -0500; Message text written by "John J. Stimson-III" "Are you addressing me because I posted the run group schedule when Don Lew couldn't find it on the web site? " -- End Original Message -- John, I was ad; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00045.html (9,635 bytes)
10. RE: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@xperformance.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:56:59 -0800; We understand your urge to raise the "I told you so" flag. You may even be correct in this case. However, as others have suggested, you are a little trigger happy on this one. Gauging the 6 run form; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00046.html (10,132 bytes)
11. RE: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@xperformance.com>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:19:30 -0800; Besides holding the start many times, we often did not have a car ready to go because we were struggling to read the barcodes and communicate between the barcode guy and the trailer. We had issues wi; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00048.html (10,220 bytes)
12. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:48:25 EST; 9. Let's admit we made a mistake, fix it, and then get on with the program.. The 8-group system really does work. My understanding from Don McKenna is that of 104 work groups in the 2005 Regular Seas; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00049.html (9,170 bytes)
13. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "Donald McKenna" <donbarbmckenna@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:35:52 -0800; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00050.html (7,561 bytes)
14. Re: run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: Glenn Ellingson <geewiz@sonic.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:09:15 -0800; Well, I got a pretty bad sunburn, and I think the 6-run format deserves about 25% of the blame :). I agree that the Boondoggle was unique with the new T&S etc. I thought 8 groups was the best system; /html/ba-autox/2006-02/msg00051.html (8,447 bytes)
15. Run groups for Boondoggle (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:17:31 -0800; Hi all, The slightly revised run groups are posted for Round 1 of SFR's Regional Championship Series here: http://www.sfrscca.org/solo2/Results/2004/Championship/round1_info.html --Pat Kelly; /html/ba-autox/2004-01/msg00070.html (6,565 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]