Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*running\s+board\s+trim\s+attachment\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*running\s+board\s+trim\s+attachment\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: "Douglas Ormrod" <Douglas.Ormrod@neurological.org.nz>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:07:02 +1300; Giday T people I am about to fit new trim strips and rubber to my TD running boards. Pop (blind) rivits seems the obvious way of fixing the metal strips, but is this how they were attached originally; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00064.html (7,956 bytes)
2. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: Emgeeguy@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:38:20 EST; Or did they use little nuts and bolts. yes. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/arc; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00065.html (7,659 bytes)
3. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:52:36 -0600; Or did they use little nuts and bolts. yes. <<<Snip>>> Oh contrair, they were originally held on by pop rivets. At least that's the 25559 came from the factory and 11xxx did. /// unsubscribe/change; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00066.html (7,650 bytes)
4. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: "Scott Allen" <sallen6363@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 07:43:32 -0500; Yeah, not too long ago I saw a TA barn find being stripped down and there were rivets under the strips. Which explained something that I'd run into on my TD restoration: I'd stripped the running boar; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00067.html (8,387 bytes)
5. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:39:42 EST; TA's would have used screws. Pop rivets had not been invented at that time nor phillips head/posi screws. Someone had taken the easy way when replacing the strips along the way. Of course with things; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00068.html (7,934 bytes)
6. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:25:26 -0500; As did both of mine, 10855 and 23618. However, I suspect that Blake is using the term 'pop rivets' a bit loosely. They are real rivets. Bud Krueger /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordom; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00069.html (7,969 bytes)
7. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: "Scott Allen" <sallen6363@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:26:43 -0500; Invented in Scotland prior to WWI. See http://www.assemblymag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Ite m/0,6493,100045,00.html /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00070.html (8,410 bytes)
8. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: "Clive Sherriff" <clive.sherriff@ntlworld.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:30:42 -0000; Enough Said........................ Clive http://www.assemblymag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Ite there is /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00071.html (9,078 bytes)
9. RE: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: "Lew Palmer" <lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:11:08 -0600; I agree. When I tore down my 1936 PB, the fume shield at the base of the firewall was attached with something approaching pop rivets. It was pretty obvious that they had been there from the beginning; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00072.html (9,019 bytes)
10. Re: running board trim attachment (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:13:07 EST; OK all, I stand corrected....but my fume seal on the NA was a smashed over alloy rivet, not pop. I have seen now that MG was using phillips head or posidrive screws on the TF so maybe they were capab; /html/mg-t/2006-02/msg00074.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]