Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*running\s+temp\s+yet\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*running\s+temp\s+yet\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. running temp yet again (score: 1): Author: Tyson Sherman <tsherman@tecinfo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 20:13:21 -0500; Okay, I was convinced that my B was meant to run on the warm side of the "N" of the gauge - 76 MGB. I drained the water / antifreeze mixture and ran it three times with water only. Each time it got t; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00676.html (7,105 bytes)
2. Re: running temp yet again (score: 1): Author: Der schwarze Buccaneer <js-allen@students.uiuc.edu>; Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 20:35:39 -0500 (CDT); Well, the sending unit is cheaper to replace.... -Scott Allen js-allen@students.uiuc.edu "At dawn we will face the greatest test of our resolve. But I say this: though starving, hunger will not weake; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00679.html (7,278 bytes)
3. Re: running temp yet again (score: 1): Author: Lane Rollins <laner@teleport.com>; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 06:52:05 -0800; I would guess that they are just fine. If you really want it to be right on the N you can adjust the gauge. WARNING: the following is from memory, and before the morning coffee use at your own risk.; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00705.html (8,262 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]