Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rws\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*rws\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 18:25:03 -0600; I cant see any reason why anyone would build a 50cc side car streamliner either, but scta/bni/usfra allow it..... drive on individualists and innovation 763mph rear steer beats all them from steers J; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00106.html (10,741 bytes)
22. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 19:53:23 -0600; I have yet to hear the words "rear engine modified roadster" on the list. Wes; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00108.html (10,592 bytes)
23. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 19:49:01 -0700; Wes; You must not have been lisitening when I asked Dan why Freddy, Harry Hoffman, and Calvin Smith were building Rear Engine Modified Roadsters. And Dan said he had no idea why they were doing that; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00110.html (8,142 bytes)
24. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "Glen Barrett" <speedtimer@charter.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 12:18:04 -0700; Not wanting to start a war on RWS but it's in the rule book for reasons. It's under the definition of automobile and I sure don't think we are going to change it real soon. I understand what you are; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00116.html (8,242 bytes)
25. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 04:25:40 -0600; Sorry! I do remember now you mention it. Isn't that roadster of Harry's a winner? I liked it as a front engined car but this configuration is really nice. It's the right color of red too. Wes; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00120.html (8,361 bytes)
26. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:51:21 -0700; Dave I love your responses and our bench racing. Please keep them coming. I whole heartly accept you apology even though one not needed. As you read in this format I always go back to the "book" beca; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00127.html (7,911 bytes)
27. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: pork.pie@t-online.de (Pork Pie); Date: 04 Oct 2003 18:49 GMT; Sorry, Joe, this is wrong.... Pork Pie "Joe Amo" <jkamo@rap.midco.net> schrieb:; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00128.html (7,844 bytes)
28. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:22:15 EDT; << 760+mph with rear steer aint a bad bench mark if ya can make it work at 760, then it CAN work at 175-200-300-400+ mph >> I hope everyone has RWS, except me! Jack; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00131.html (7,556 bytes)
29. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 17:25:16 EDT; << All this discussion is amusing, but until the rules change, it is just that....discussion. >> Discussion is better than voice mail! Jack; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00132.html (7,451 bytes)
30. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 06:00:24 -0400; Always like bench racing with as well JD.. Here is something to consider when you get a minute, have a cold one on me and see if you think as an inspector this would make your life a bunch easier in; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00274.html (10,240 bytes)
31. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 20:54:17 EDT; << Them we would need a chassis dyno to inspect the cars. Lets all vote for keeping the rules simple and easy to interpret as the penalties for guessing wrong are way to large to take lightly. Dave >; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00284.html (7,514 bytes)
32. Re: rws (score: 1): Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 20:30:06 -0600; yeah Jack, how about making everyone manually back off and on their ignition timing, or fuel injector spray as well?? we dont want to see anyone forced to use anything as much as we dont want to be f; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00289.html (7,831 bytes)
33. RE: rws (score: 1): Author: "Arne Hulstein" <Arne.Hulstein@digitaldreamers.info>; Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 10:31:37 -0700; So what if you program the engine computer to react to changes in traction on the wheels and lost of other parameters with the driver operating the throttle as a guidline for the engine to perform by; /html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00303.html (7,727 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]