Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*scuttle\s+\'shake\,\s+rattle\s+and\s+roll\'\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*scuttle\s+\'shake\,\s+rattle\s+and\s+roll\'\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Allen C Miller, Jr." <acmiller@mhcable.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:33:22 -0500; Thanks much to all who replied on the thread. It seems your near-unanimous concensus that, after truing drums, wheels and tires via Hendrix, checking the shock mounts, and verifying all body panels a; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00038.html (8,775 bytes)
2. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "John Soderling" <jsoderling@astound.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:46:29 -0800; Two points. 1. Most scuttle shake is usually a result of front suspension components. Therefore, the best single thing you can do is have your wheels and tires dynamically balanced "on the car". Thi; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00044.html (10,382 bytes)
3. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: Blue One Hundred <healey.nut@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:12:53 +0800; I notice you mentioned that you put on a new drive shaft or U joints. I should note that if the two halves of your driveshaft are not put back together correctly, you will get harmonic vibration. Di; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00050.html (10,159 bytes)
4. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Ph.J.Aeckerlin" <j.aeckerlin@tiscali.nl>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:26:55 +0100; Sorry John, but dynamically balancing "on the car" is not possible, as far as I know. There are two types of balancing: dynamic and static. Dynamic balancing means the object is mounted on a machine; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00055.html (10,057 bytes)
5. RE: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Davies" <rdavies1@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 06:29:12 -0800; "Sorry John, but dynamically balancing "on the car" is not possible, as far as I know." Actually, it is possible but it is very hard to find someone who will do it. I've been told that there is someo; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00059.html (8,408 bytes)
6. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "P.J.Aeckerlin" <j.aeckerlin@tiscali.nl>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 17:27:50 +0100; Ron, tremendously sorry but dynamically balancing on the car is absolutely impossible, unless you change the definition of dynamic balancing. For dynamic balancing it is imperative to very accurately; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00064.html (10,296 bytes)
7. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: Douglas W Flagg <dwflagg@juno.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:17:41 -0500; I have been driving my friends BN4, on and off, while he is deployed on active duty. It had a bad shake around 55 - 60 mph, even after the wheels had been balanced off the car. I then took the car t; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00066.html (10,736 bytes)
8. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: Russ Staub <bbb11489@azboss.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 10:51:38 -0700; You are probably right re the theoretical impossibility of dynamic balancing wheels on the car, but I also, as Doug said, have had great luck (perhaps that is what it was) in getting completely rid; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00068.html (9,469 bytes)
9. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:43:15 -0700; I don't know if this info helps; Hendrix shaves the tires to perfectly round after mounting. A tire that is not round will bounce no matter how well balanced it is. My tires that they mounted, shave; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00070.html (9,574 bytes)
10. RE: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Davies" <rdavies1@cox.net>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:07:22 -0800; --Original Message-- Ron, tremendously sorry but dynamically balancing on the car is absolutely impossible, unless you change the definition of dynamic balancing. Jack: I'm sure you're right. I'm not; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00075.html (8,471 bytes)
11. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "R. Cobb" <rcobb@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 16:23:25 -0600; As to dynamic balancing on the car, I found this reference: "Automotive Suspension, Steering and Brakes", by Ellinger and Hathaway, printed sometime in the 70's or so. According to them (after stati; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00077.html (9,730 bytes)
12. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "P.J.Aeckerlin" <j.aeckerlin@tiscali.nl>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 10:51:44 +0100; Well, in the 70's electronics were very expensive gimmicks. Remember the prices for the first desk top electronic calculators? Nowadays electronics are not only cheap, they give far more possibilitie; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00095.html (11,040 bytes)
13. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: Dave & M <rusd@velocitus.net>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:42:02 -0700; Hello Jack, I remember 50 years ago. Tires had not yet become radial. Many were not perfectly round. The wealthier fanatics had their tires "shaved" to round. I personally took the claims of reduced; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00097.html (10,821 bytes)
14. RE: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Ron Davies" <rdavies1@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 15:00:27 -0800; "I know from experience that there is no down side to shaving/truing except the extra cost." Except where the exception makes the rule. Or when some idiot shaves so much off you have a bald spot whic; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00110.html (8,100 bytes)
15. Re: scuttle 'shake, rattle and roll' (score: 1): Author: "Frenken, Eric" <efrenken@lctax.de>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:38:33 +0100; Hi Jack, what you describe is exactly what I did half a year ago. And it worked like a charm. Runs as calm as my allday driver. But one question came up when I watched the guy doing patiently his wor; /html/healeys/2006-02/msg00193.html (10,526 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]