Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*seat\s+belt\s+thread\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*seat\s+belt\s+thread\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: seat belt thread (score: 1): Author: "FRED E THOMAS" <frede.thomas2@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:52:00 -0500; Seat belts became mandatory on all "NEW" 1964 cars, any make or model, before that date it is not mandatory to have seat belts or even kiddie seats or restraints, including booster seats, I do have t; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00282.html (6,851 bytes)
2. Fw: seat belt thread (score: 1): Author: "FRED E THOMAS" <frede.thomas2@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 09:57:48 -0500; Sorry for got to include the not, also I have none in my 55 T/Bird == Seat belts became mandatory on all "NEW" 1964 cars, any make or model, before that date it is not mandatory to have seat belts or; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00284.html (6,982 bytes)
3. RE: seat belt thread (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:40:54 -0800; Not quite true Fred, California requires that small children always be restrained. That means you cannot, by law, take a small child in a car that is not fitted with seat belts, even if the car was; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00286.html (7,941 bytes)
4. Re: seat belt thread (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:10:34 -0500; == Actually, back then, laws varied from state to state. In New York, for example: -front belt mountings required for 1963 models in NY -at least two front belts required for 1965 models in NY -belts; /html/triumphs/2005-01/msg00289.html (7,778 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]