- 1. shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: Sean Bartnik <sbart7kb@www.mwc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 98 15:00:55 EST
- Hey all, No, this question is not about Lucas electrics :-) This question is about shock absorbers. I've seen some references to a special sort of shocks fitted to some MGs, called "lever shocks" or
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01650.html (7,825 bytes)
- 2. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:00:18 -0800 (PST)
- Rather than risk being like any other automobile in the world, LBCs have their own special flavor of shock absorbers. Actually, the shocks on MGBs etc. are anachronisms from the 1930s. They are an ol
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01657.html (9,179 bytes)
- 3. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:12:59 -0800
- Sorry to chime in again, but this seems an obvious time to talk again about the Colt shock conversion I did. So far, I'm very impressed and they're much more controlled than lever shocks. I am NOT a
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01665.html (10,974 bytes)
- 4. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 15:32:26 -0800 (PST)
- Dear Andy, Are these the same plans that were recently (a week or two ago) posted on this group? =%OSorry to chime in again, but this seems an obvious time to talk again =%Oabout the Colt shock conve
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01666.html (11,238 bytes)
- 5. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: Andy Ramm <aramm@concentric.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 16:03:00 -0800
- I'll repost the complete conversion tomorrow. I have to gather the information which is sitting on my computer at home. This was Dave Tietz's discovery that '84-'88 Colt rear shocks bolt up nicely on
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01671.html (9,200 bytes)
- 6. RE: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: DANIEL RAY <danray@bluegrass.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 19:55:35 -0600
- I'm gonna hang on to your instructions this time, when you post it. I = don't think I kept the previous one.=20 Now that I've actually had my B on the lift and taken a look at the real = thing, I se
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01673.html (10,325 bytes)
- 7. RE: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Pfau <apfau@ismi.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 21:27:39 -0600
- CCCCFDTJKJNMUUILFMGMCVGTRRDDZSSIUJKLL JJKJJJJKJKK JKLIKKODGFSL4154N4H5ALEXMFJKJVM,ALECPONQWEAASSSWDHNNMMMKKK
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01706.html (7,203 bytes)
- 8. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: "David F. Darby" <darby@tri-lakes.net>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 07:55:22 -0600
- That's easy for you to say, Alan. David Darby -- <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>; bill <pplusb@northlink.com>; Sean Bartnik <sbart7kb@www.mwc.edu>; Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> JKLIKKODGFSL4154N4H5AL
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01716.html (7,797 bytes)
- 9. RE: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: "John J. Peloquin" <peloquin@mamba.bio.uci.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 07:35:48 -0800 (PST)
- Dear Alan, What does the following message mean? Did your keyboard stick? =%OCCCCFDTJKJNMUUILFMGMCVGTRRDDZSSIUJKLL JJKJJJJKJKK JKLIKKODGFSL4154N4H5ALEXMFJKJVM,ALECPONQWEAASSSWDHNNMMMKKK =%O "Never as
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01726.html (7,632 bytes)
- 10. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:13:23 -0500
- We can't even agree what MOWOG means, what they hell can we do with this! -- Trevor Boicey Ottawa, Canada tboicey@brit.ca http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01761.html (7,431 bytes)
- 11. Re: shocking question (score: 1)
- Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison)
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:38:34 EST
- Maybe there's a prize for the best Photo to go along with the caption? Or it could be a secret code between spies from the Tr**h list. On Fri, 23 Jan 1998 23:13:23 -0500 Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.c
- /html/mgs/1998-01/msg01765.html (7,796 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu