Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*shorrock\s+vs\.\s+judson\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*shorrock\s+vs\.\s+judson\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: BANJOJOHN@aol.com; Date: Sat, 4 Dec 1999 11:29:28 EST; I'm still thinking about a supercharger for my bugeye ( with 1098). Does anyone know anything about Shorrock SC as compared with Judson? Does anyone have either of these running on their car currentl; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00164.html (7,702 bytes)
2. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: type79@ix.netcom.com; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 12:48:16 -0800; I have never talked with an owner of a car with a shorrock installed, but Judson owners with proper installations do not report substantial power gains. Other than for historical curiosity, your tim; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00168.html (8,559 bytes)
3. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Dec 1999 19:15:11 -0500; I hear the same thing Jay hears. I have no personal expierience either just that my 1275 blew the doors of Georges Judson charge 948. -- Frank Clarici Toms River, NJ Too many Sprites (again) There is; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00179.html (8,873 bytes)
4. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: "Andy Webster" <trunkie@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 1999 12:58:53 GMT; Hi John, Check out: http://www.hi-flow.com/ These guys can supply a brand new twin rotor supercharger. They're not far from me if you want someone to check them out for you. Andy; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00196.html (8,556 bytes)
5. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 08:16:43 EST; Neither unit is very keen on prolonged high rpm usage and ultimately this limits power (ie a 286 cammed 1275 running at 6,500 will produce more power and can rev to 7,000 before shifting to stay in t; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00197.html (8,436 bytes)
6. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: GMari58175@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 05:50:26 EST; << I hear the same thing Jay hears. I have no personal expierience either just that my 1275 blew the doors of Georges Judson charge 948. >> But my 948 ran much hotter.....so there! george marinos spr; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00238.html (8,002 bytes)
7. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: "Robert Duquette" <RobertDuquette@Sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 06:46:23 -0500; Even with the doors off ??? --Original Message-- From: GMari58175@aol.com <GMari58175@aol.com> To: spritenut@Exit109.com <spritenut@Exit109.com>; type79@ix.netcom.com <type79@ix.netcom.com> Cc: BANJO; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00240.html (8,482 bytes)
8. RE: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Thompson <dthompson@gbc.ca>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 07:31:41 -0500; I would like to hear from the Judson owners with "proper" installations who do not report substantial power gains. Daniel58612; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00241.html (9,082 bytes)
9. RE: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: Daniel Thompson <dthompson@gbc.ca>; Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1999 07:58:32 -0500; I think Daniel has hit the nail on the head here as far as a debate over the power boost Judsons can give. These superchargers were available when stock bugeyes (or Mk2 Sprites) were running 45 hp an; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00242.html (10,028 bytes)
10. Re: shorrock vs. judson? (score: 1): Author: Bkitterer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 02:22:38 EST; << John, I have never talked with an owner of a car with a shorrock installed, but Judson owners with proper installations do not report substantial power gains. Other than for historical curiosity,; /html/spridgets/1999-12/msg00394.html (8,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]