- 1. show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:00:47 -0400
- I have one really big peeve when it comes to cars shows and that is "BEST of SHOW", when this award is given does that mean it is the very best at the show or the most unusual/rare,t VTR the "Gloria"
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00434.html (8,032 bytes)
- 2. RE: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 09:56:32 -0700
- Fred, "best" is a subjective measure, and I think the VTR "Best of Show" award reflects that. There were lots of beautiful cars at the show (yours was one of them), but I personally thought it entir
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00451.html (8,443 bytes)
- 3. show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 13:43:44 -0400
- Message text written by "Fred Thomas" are there anyway, if an award is to be given it should be either named for someone such as the "Presidents Award" etc, because you have a very unusual/rare car s
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00452.html (7,916 bytes)
- 4. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:46:31 -0700
- I think that in "People's Choice" judging, the term "Best" means "favorite" or "the one I would like to drive home". In concours judging, it is at best subjective and unfortunately the people who get
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00455.html (9,698 bytes)
- 5. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:51:47 -0700
- Interesting that you mention this, Dave. Last year at the 10th British Car Days celebration in Mesilla, NM. My little red Spit was chosen Best Triumph and I was duly proud since there were examples o
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00456.html (9,072 bytes)
- 6. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:35:07 -0400
- Message text written by "Fred Thomas" are there anyway, if an award is to be given it should be either named for someone such as the "Presidents Award" etc, because you have a very unusual/rare car s
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00458.html (8,560 bytes)
- 7. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:41:52 -0400
- Car Days celebration in Mesilla, NM. My little red Spit was chosen Best and TR7's there. But what really floored me is that it was also given the British Motoring! from a club made up mostly of MG o
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00461.html (9,278 bytes)
- 8. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 11:38:31 -0700
- Craig, If we were talking about successes, I am quite sure the conversation would not be all that long. But with screw-ups, we would be talking all night, or at least until the beer ran out! :) Joe /
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00463.html (8,886 bytes)
- 9. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:25:25 -0400
- You just named all the classes!! Thats one of the problem with the VTR judging, the nicest car does not always get best in class, most of the time its one of the sponsoring clubs cars at the annual V
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00465.html (8,259 bytes)
- 10. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 20:26:11 -0400
- Message text written by James V Laviana III judging, the nicest car does not always get best in class, most of the time its one of the sponsoring clubs cars at the annual VTR National! < That's what'
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00475.html (8,619 bytes)
- 11. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 19:54:01 -0500
- It was written: So, are we saying that People's Choice judging is more "objective" than Concours judging? I sure hope not - I reserve the right to be totally subjective when filling out my ballot. (A
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00477.html (9,689 bytes)
- 12. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 17:57:47 -0700
- But Jim, when it is over, don't you end up voting for the car in each class that you would like to drive home over all the others posed against it? Everyone has their own criteria, be it driving lamp
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00478.html (11,021 bytes)
- 13. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:49:49 EDT
- Going on the assumption that you intended "judging" as that (referring to the VTR Concours and not to Participants' Choice), do you have any evidence of this? Just curious.... Participants' Choice is
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00480.html (8,481 bytes)
- 14. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 21:20:07 -0500
- Of People's Choice voting, it was written: That may be one yardstick, but not mine. There are a lot of cars that I've admired (and voted for) that'd be far down the list of cars I'd want to take home
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00482.html (8,369 bytes)
- 15. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:25:38 EDT
- The best prize I ever received is the smile my wife had on her face when she took her rusted, banged up, dirty and smelly Spitfire for a quick drive around the block for the first time. That smile la
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00560.html (8,616 bytes)
- 16. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 13:28:57 -0400
- I'm talking about "Concours Judging" not popular vote. The judges should be impartial, and the points should determine the winners! ________________________________________________________________ GE
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00577.html (7,882 bytes)
- 17. Re: show judging (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 20:34:50 -0400
- Message text written by James V Laviana III be impartial, and the points should determine the winners! < A lot of traffic has passed through the list and I am a bit unsure what this is in response to
- /html/triumphs/2002-05/msg00645.html (9,132 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu