Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*small\,\s+inexpensive\,\s+good\s+tablesaw\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*small\,\s+inexpensive\,\s+good\s+tablesaw\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:48:55 -0500 (EST); I find myself in need of a small/portable inexpensive table saw. Anyone got any recommendations? Mostly I want it for stuff like cutting down trim boards or other 'not quite rough carpentry' tasks v; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00061.html (6,812 bytes)
2. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Darrell Walker <darrellw@ipns.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 16:11:29 -0800; Hi Mark, This is probably bigger and more expensive than you are looking for, but I bought one of these this spring: http://www.toolbarn.com/product/bosch/4000-09/ It is a very nice saw, and the grav; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00062.html (6,548 bytes)
3. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:38:24 -0500 (EST); If I just needed accurate crosscuts, I think one of these would work quite well, but the primary thing I'm wanting is the ability to rip with more accuracy than I can with a skillsaw. I'd like to fi; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00065.html (8,514 bytes)
4. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Doug Braun <doug@dougbraun.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 18:55:59 -0800 (PST); Avoid Ryobi. Their cheaper tools are just too lightweight and flimsy. I have one of those approximately $179 Sears 10" table saws, and it has served me well. They have sold numerous variants of the s; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00066.html (8,529 bytes)
5. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Jim Franklin <jamesf@groupwbench.org>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:09:14 -0500; I borrowed a friend's Ryobi while I trimmed Ikea particleboard cabinets and toe kicks and it worked very well. It folds up, can be wheeled about, and fits in the back of my Impreza wagon. jim; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00068.html (7,890 bytes)
6. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:12:37 -0500 (EST); So the Ryobi BTS20 isn't a good choice? http://www.homedepot.com/prel80/HDUS/EN_US/diy_main/pg_diy.jsp?BV_SessionID=@@@@0145675167.1166411098@@@@&BV_EngineID=ccckaddjjghkljicgelceffdfgidgin.0&CNTTYP; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00069.html (9,132 bytes)
7. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Pat Horne <roadsters@hornesystemstx.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:34:13 -0600; I have no experience with the BTS20 but I did have a TB3000 for a couple years. It worked fine except when ripping long boards. Then it bogged down. It required a heavy duty extension cord., 12 Ga.or; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00071.html (10,755 bytes)
8. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:08:06 -0500 (EST); Looks like Home Depot (at least online) carries both the Ryobi, Rigid, and Bosch saws that look to cover the range in the portable market... I'll check them out in person. I'd be interested in somet; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00073.html (8,535 bytes)
9. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Charlie Schlismann <racegt6@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:09:35 -0800 (PST); Mark, Years ago I bought a King Feng Fu (I'm not making this up) from Builders' Square Or HD for $36.00-marked down from $52.00. Ten inches of cheap love. It is extremely portable, but having no mass; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00074.html (9,067 bytes)
10. RE: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: PJ McGarvey <pj_mcgarvey@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:14:13 -0500; I have a Ryobi BTS-15 (same saw w/out the stand I think) for those portability situations, but for any type of finish work, I'd trust my Ridgid 3650, which is a great saw. I would assume, and have re; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00085.html (9,139 bytes)
11. Re: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Pat Horne <roadsters@hornesystemstx.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:21:30 -0600; Ripping 2x material with this type of guide will not be easy, or maybe not possible. For that you might want to look into getting a fence that is made to fit your saw. For cutting tis type of materi; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00086.html (9,299 bytes)
12. RE: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:19:10 -0500 (EST); So, went and looked at a bunch of table saws today... So far the Ryobi BTS20R is in the lead. I was all set to love the Rigid TS3650 Contractor saw... But that thing is just _so_ big. The table has; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00090.html (8,584 bytes)
13. RE: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: PJ McGarvey <pj_mcgarvey@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 08:14:04 -0500; My 3650 casters actually work pretty well, since I assembled and adjusted it. I have a very uneven garage floor, and I rotate the saw pretty often to make room without any problem, on occasion I'm ab; /html/shop-talk/2006-12/msg00091.html (9,100 bytes)
14. RE: small, inexpensive, good tablesaw (score: 1): Author: Mark Andy <mark@sccaprepared.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 14:11:41 -0500 (EST); I don't believe I ever posted on what I ended up getting.... After stopping at a home depot and playing with all the saws, I'd pretty much made up my mind to go with the Ryobi BTS20R. It was half th; /html/shop-talk/2007-01/msg00066.html (7,900 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]