Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sorry\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Sorry (score: 1)
Author: RACE427@aol.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:34:49 EDT
/html/land-speed/2006-06/msg00455.html (5,931 bytes)

2. sorry (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 12:58:09 -0500
I'm sorry about the RWS thread cluttering up some peoples' mailboxes. I've been an advocate of RWS for the last couple of years, and feel that the List is the place to discuss it. There were several
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00191.html (7,867 bytes)

3. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:47:23 -0500
John... on the contrary.... Feel Free to exercise your opinons on RWS... it's one of those things that floats your boat and it is a lot more interesting then my love life.... ( that's NOT strictly Tr
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00202.html (9,044 bytes)

4. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 15:44:40 -0500
Please don't apologize for any subject that you bring up.....the point of this list is to have discussions. While I don't agree that there is any advantage in using RWS, I certainly want to read the
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00203.html (8,616 bytes)

5. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:18:35 -0700
Certainly does not offend me, John. This is a technical sport and innovaion needs to be explored in every manner possible. I am guiltier than most in tossing out stuff to bench race about and to anal
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00206.html (9,082 bytes)

6. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "atrav" <atravis@spacey.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 20:10:13 -0400
I enjoyed it. Even though I'll be happy if my projects steer at all, the engineering of RWS is interesting. Benchracing ideas may not always lead to successful conclusions, but you never know what po
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00208.html (7,999 bytes)

7. RE: sorry (score: 1)
Author: Jim Webb <jimwebb@nutsracing.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:03:13 -0500
I am not particularily interested in the RWS thread, but I do read most of these. The ones I don't read, I just delete. I'm sure a lot of people on the list don't care about the stuff I write about
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00209.html (9,011 bytes)

8. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: W S Potter <wester6935@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 20:35:38 -0600
How far IS the state line anyway? Wes
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00218.html (7,477 bytes)

9. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 07:11:07 -0500
uhhh I thought that's what we WERE discussing, california politics and religion......
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00229.html (7,492 bytes)

10. RE: sorry (score: 1)
Author: john robinson <john@engr.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 07:14:13 -0500
well there is a "free class" its called Time Only (TO).....and from my understanding of it, Dan, please correct me if I'm wrong, anything that meets the speed safety requirements can run for time onl
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00230.html (8,154 bytes)

11. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 06:30:48 -0700
According to the local lore the line is a whopping 8 miles from the intersection of Nev 372 and Nev 160. For me it is about 10 miles if I go on the highway. Our dry lake bed is in Kalifornica and it
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00235.html (8,009 bytes)

12. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: Nt788@aol.com
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:42:07 EDT
<< I'm sorry about the RWS thread cluttering up some peoples' mailboxes. >> It's a lot more interesting than the color of fire suits! Jack
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00238.html (7,342 bytes)

13. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 06:51:49 -0700
Yeaah, it is kind of the same thing isn't it?
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00241.html (7,841 bytes)

14. RE: sorry (score: 1)
Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:49:06 -0500
don't let the whiners get you down. Not a favorite technology of mine, either-- but the number of responses-- from that many different people-- prove that rws has been one of our most popular topics
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00254.html (8,391 bytes)

15. Re: sorry (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:01:11 -0600
John, keep up the rws stuff, because so many say it cant be done makes me more hopeful that someone like you will show them wrong, makes me want to do it just for that reason I have had more people t
/html/land-speed/2003-10/msg00277.html (9,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu