Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*spit\s+crankshafts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*spit\s+crankshafts\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: spit crankshafts (score: 1): Author: "John Kipping" <johnkipping@inet.net.nz>; Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:47:51 +1200; In actual fact the change from scroll to oil seal was made in 1965, I think the last of the Spitfire Mk IIs had oil seal cranks, and very early 1300 engines (fitted to the 1300 FWD in the UK) had scr; /html/fot/2003-09/msg00001.html (7,947 bytes)
2. spit crankshafts (score: 1): Author: "Brad Kahler" <brad.kahler@141.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 21:31:25 -0500; Somewhere I thought I read that the 1147 spitfire crankshafts are the same as the 1300 crankshafts. Unfortunately I can't find where I might have read that. Can anyone confirm or deny that rumor?! T; /html/fot/2003-08/msg00208.html (6,489 bytes)
3. Re: spit crankshafts (score: 1): Author: "Tom Strange" <tstrange@new.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 19:24:46 -0500; Anyone please correct me if I am wrong here..... To my knowledge, crankshaft wise, there are 4 engines... all 1147s' use the same crankshaft.... early 1296 uses the same 1147 crank as far as journal; /html/fot/2003-08/msg00209.html (7,981 bytes)
4. Re: spit crankshafts (score: 1): Author: "Jeffery Senty" <gp89@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 20:28:36 -0500; The crankshaft from a 1300 (early small journal) can be used in an 1147 with no problems as long as you use the oil seal housing from a 1300. The 1147 did not have a rear main seal,it relied on a gro; /html/fot/2003-08/msg00210.html (7,412 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]