- 21. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 16:43:31 -0500
- Bill, be kind enough to tell us which starter, flywheel and backing plate you
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00896.html (7,985 bytes)
- 22. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 22:02:44 EDT
- << Bill, be kind enough to tell us which starter, flywheel and backing plate you used. John >> I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you! You need a Lucas starter with the solenoid on the top r
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00904.html (7,512 bytes)
- 23. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 21:11:18 -0700
- Could the perception of more power from the starter motor be a result of the later starter engaging with a ring gear that is 3/4" larger in diameter? That would change the gearing between the starte
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00910.html (7,787 bytes)
- 24. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 02:23:07 EDT
- << Could the perception of more power from the starter motor be a result of the later starter engaging with a ring gear that is 3/4" larger in diameter? That would change the gearing between the star
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00913.html (7,220 bytes)
- 25. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrie Alexander" <Lawrie@britcars.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 07:06:59 -0700
- Oops, did I misread your first note? I thought you were comparing the pre-engaged starter to the earlier starter. Should I have read it to mean that you were comparing two different types of pre-enga
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00917.html (8,006 bytes)
- 26. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 11:09:42 EDT
- << Oops, did I misread your first note? I thought you were comparing the pre-engaged starter to the earlier starter. Should I have read it to mean that you were comparing two different types of pre-e
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00920.html (7,939 bytes)
- 27. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 12:02:00 -0500
- Thanks for the details. I do hope that you won't feel it necessary to do away with the innocent guy whose name I used in requesting the info. He knows nothing!
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00929.html (7,980 bytes)
- 28. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 15:01:18 EDT
- << I do hope that you won't feel it necessary to do away with the innocent guy whose name I used in requesting the info. He knows nothing! Can I quote you on that?? Bill
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg00940.html (7,018 bytes)
- 29. Re: Starter (score: 1)
- Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@huntnet.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 11:10:05 -0500
- I don't know. John
- /html/mgs/1999-05/msg01000.html (7,298 bytes)
- 30. starter (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Houkal <erictw@mcs.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:22:52 -0500
- Well, since I already have several cars that I'll never finish, I'm = going to do the right thing and go look at a cheap 71 B Saturday. The = current owner says the previous owner installed a positiv
- /html/mgs/1996-09/msg00628.html (6,866 bytes)
- 31. Re: starter (score: 1)
- Author: jurrasm@genesis.torrco.com (Mark Jurras)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 10:33:58 -0400
- Unless the positive ground cars had a different shape starter in them there should be no difference between a "positive" and "negative" ground starter. Since the magnetic fields are electrically gen
- /html/mgs/1996-09/msg00634.html (7,480 bytes)
- 32. Re: starter (score: 1)
- Author: kboetzer@auspex.com (Ken Boetzer)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:08:51 -0700
- Converted a B and a Spit...No change to the started in either case. Positive Ground Starter?! Cheers, Ken (Never heard of one!) Boetzer
- /html/mgs/1996-09/msg00637.html (7,761 bytes)
- 33. Re: starter (score: 1)
- Author: TATERRY@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 14:41:32 -0400
- << a positive ground starter >> There is no such thing as a positive ground starter.....starter motors are series wound and run the same direction regardless of polarity....you would have to go insid
- /html/mgs/1996-09/msg00643.html (6,973 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu