Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stupid\s+timing\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*stupid\s+timing\s+question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring); Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 10:51:12 -0400; Fellow fiends: Please settle these issues: I'm having a 'discussion' with a member of my local car guy support group on timing the venerable B-series engine. Please tell me if the following statement; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00738.html (8,407 bytes)
2. Re: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: Michael Chaffee <mchaffee@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 15:27:18 -0500 (CDT); Um, usually there will be a dynamic timing spec, which will give you better timing in the event that the distributor's advance curve is not what it was/should be. It is my humble opinion, to boot, th; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00755.html (10,307 bytes)
3. Re: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: Gary Burrell <garyb@pentek.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 16:48:31 -0700; Well, the Bentley version of the shop manual lists static timing as the recommended way to do it. I've done both, I can say if there was much difference. Well with my ported polish head, LCB big bore; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00758.html (8,908 bytes)
4. Re: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 00:09:58 -0400; Don't listen to him. This, actually, is partly true. My car's vaccum advance was broken when I bought it this spring, and it runs great. However, a discalimer: I don't have much to compare it to, as; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00773.html (9,568 bytes)
5. Re: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: Ragthyme@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 11:18:31 -0400; I'll second those who say that each car has its own sweet spot as far as timing goes. In the UK, and many US drivers do it as well, there's a 'road timing' method that works quite well. It involves; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00791.html (8,032 bytes)
6. Re: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: erasjfr@lmera.ericsson.se (Steve Foster ZD/KC); Date: Thu, 22 Aug 96 15:42:04 +0200; Since the guy is a good friend I won't call him a prat! The B lump responds excellently to both mild and heavy tuning. Why did MG give out tuning tips to all those hungry for more performance? There; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00825.html (7,357 bytes)
7. RE: stupid timing question (score: 1): Author: "Randy Rees (Starwave)" <Randyr@starwave.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Aug 96 11:53:00 PDT; I believe Huffacker was turning out even more than 140bhp in the sixties and seventies. I would love to know what they can push today. Since the guy is a good friend I won't call him a prat! The B lu; /html/mgs/1996-08/msg00853.html (7,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]