Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*supercharge\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*supercharge\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. supercharge (score: 1): Author: TrmpetDave@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 01:14:24 EST; Speaking of superchargers, I have been told that back when the +8 engine was powering Buick Specials, and Oldsmobiles, that a turbocharged version was available for the Olds. I also understand that a; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00109.html (7,336 bytes)
2. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: "Greg Solow" <gregmogdoc@surfnetusa.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 23:35:27 -0800; Bill Fink has been doing Turbocharged +8s for years. We currently have a 5 liter, Turbocharged, intercooled, alloy bodied +8 that he did a number of years ago in our shop for some clutch work and to; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00110.html (8,408 bytes)
3. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: Jhalfdime@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 05:55:15 EST; Having worked at the local Olds dealer in '63 and '64 I can vouch for the accuracy of your information. The Olds was called the "Jetfire," (Later to become MUCH LARGER) and was a Cutlass coupe (Or co; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00111.html (7,799 bytes)
4. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: "William Eastman" <william.eastman@medtronic.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:10:48 -0600; Another unique atribute of the Olds version was the use of additional headbolts due to the turbocharger pressures. Of the GM versions, the Olds engine may be the one to have. Now days people consider; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00113.html (7,746 bytes)
5. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: MOGLOOM@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:12:10 EST; Whoa! Wasn't the Tempest that "Gem" with the bent driveshaft running at engine speed to the transaxle? Sounds like fun Huh? Richard; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00116.html (7,333 bytes)
6. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: CHarris990@aol.com; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:32:46 EST; In a message dated 12/14/99 10:13:36 AM Central Standard Time, MOGLOOM@aol.com writes: Richard << Whoa! Wasn't the Tempest that "Gem" with the bent driveshaft running at engine speed to the transaxle; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00117.html (7,672 bytes)
7. Fw: supercharge (score: 1): Author: "The Charltons" <charlton@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 10:57:16 -0600; Does anyone remember what these Olds systems looked like? I recall once reading that GM had an induction system on F-85s (maybe this was not the production design) that used a jet of air from the tur; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00119.html (8,490 bytes)
8. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: "William Eastman" <william.eastman@medtronic.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:13:09 -0600; Yeah, well- just remember that the Ford Fairmont made R&T's "10 Best Cars for a Changing World" list in 1979 or so. To show the depth of their ignorance, they later wrote, after testing a Chevy Citat; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00120.html (8,445 bytes)
9. RE: supercharge (score: 1): Author: Gerry Willburn <Gerry.Willburn@trw.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 09:27:07 -0800; You do not read "Road & Track" to find out about sedans. You read "Consumer Reports" to find out about sedans. You read "Road & Track" to find out about Sports Cars (and read Dennis Simanaitis' colum; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00121.html (9,344 bytes)
10. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: "Snake 357" <snake357@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 11:38:33 PST; Production figures I have state that 3,765 turo charged F-85 Jetfires were built for 1962 & 5,842 for 1963. Oldsmobile claimed this was the first production car in the US industry to deliver 1 horese; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00124.html (8,579 bytes)
11. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 02:46:44 EST; Yes, but aside from some early failures of the center support bearing it worked very well and had the advantage of moving the weight of the transaxle and clutch to the rear. It used the Corvair trans; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00132.html (7,446 bytes)
12. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: DGreimel@aol.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 03:02:54 EST; I guess Olds was not aware of the FI `57 Corvette 283ci-283hp.; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00134.html (7,202 bytes)
13. Re: supercharge (score: 1): Author: MOGLOOM@aol.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:27:08 EST; Right on Gerry; /html/morgans/1999-12/msg00141.html (7,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]