Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*survivor\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Survivor (score: 1)
Author: "James E. Pickard" <geowiz@cox-internet.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:49:32 -0500
I'm pleased to report that among Hurricane Lili's victims was NOT B9473298. We evacuated to Houston, but Tigger remained in the garage. We suffered no damage to the house and only lost one large oak
/html/tigers/2002-10/msg00103.html (6,938 bytes)

2. survivor (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Buck" <dave@chesmorebuck.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 14:12:34 -0800
I have a general question that I would like some opinions on. My tiger is a low mile (72K) survivor, with original paint and interior, that I have owned for 34 years. I drive the car occasionally, ma
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00021.html (7,196 bytes)

3. RE: survivor (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:32:15 -0500
All automobile communities appreciate original survivor examples; they give us Rootes.;) These are the cars that let us see how the factory put these cars together. To many of us they are priceless
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00022.html (8,321 bytes)

4. Re: survivor (score: 1)
Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:45:41 -0500
I too have a survivor. It is a matter of principle to keep it "pure". Not as much fun but something to do. True original cars are becoming rare. Gary B9472283 -- Original Message --
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00023.html (7,545 bytes)

5. Re: survivor (score: 1)
Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 17:58:24 -0700
Original survivor cars are magical because they can't be created... once you take the unrestoredness out you can't put it back on. What you need is a second Tiger that you can use as a daily driver ;
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00027.html (7,871 bytes)

6. Re: survivor (score: 1)
Author: Chris Thompson <chris@cthompson.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:00:48 -0500
I remember writing a rant on this list several years ago about this issue. It was Henry Ford who taught Andrew Carnegie to quit over-restoring antiques. The patina is what defines them. I'll spare th
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00028.html (7,072 bytes)

7. Re: survivor (score: 1)
Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 08:48:41 -0500
In my 2 cents I have nothing against a high quality restoration. To bring back a deteriorated original is applaudable. The problem with restoration is the increasing difficulty of correct spares. As
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00029.html (7,828 bytes)

8. Re: survivor (score: 1)
Author: "J. D. Johnson" <j_d_johnson@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:00:17 -0800
It's always been cheaper to modify than restore. JD
/html/tigers/2007-02/msg00030.html (6,385 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu