Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tail\s+lights\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tail\s+lights\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. tail lights (score: 1): Author: RAY WYGONIK <RWYGONIK@grove.iup.edu>; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 07:50:06 -0400 (EDT); On my 74 B the lower part of the tail lights only appear to be turn signals. they do not come on when I put the lights on. The smaller top portion appears to be both tail and brake lights. the wiring; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00694.html (7,485 bytes)
2. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: miker15@juno.com; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 08:07:23 EDT; Bob Howard posted a message a while back about how he wired in an extra bulb for just this purpose. Ive seen it and its very effective- of course i lost it - perhaps he will repeat it!! mike robson 6; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00696.html (7,945 bytes)
3. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: mgbob@juno.com (ROBERT G. HOWARD); Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 08:45:27 EDT; Hi Ray, The way yours is hooked up is the way that MG built it. I agree with you about the waste, however. My solution was to install an additional socket in the blank space behind the reflector. WIt; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00700.html (8,361 bytes)
4. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: Steve Bettencourt <steveb5815@edgenet.net>; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 08:49:11 -0500; Mike and Ray, If the lower part of the tail light is amber is it really a good idea to run it as a parking light (or running light) on the rear? Other than the '69 and earlier lenses (all red) I thou; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00703.html (7,964 bytes)
5. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: RAY WYGONIK <RWYGONIK@grove.iup.edu>; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 10:31:56 -0400 (EDT); The lower part is amber. I am not sure I understand your question as to why it might not be a good idea to use them as a tail light because they are amber. Are there laws requiring rear tail lights; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00711.html (7,244 bytes)
6. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: mgbob@juno.com (ROBERT G. HOWARD); Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 12:49:12 EDT; I wondered about the amber also, before I tried it. What actually happens is that the new light shines through the reflector and comes through red, with a tinge of yellow to it. This is a very visib; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00725.html (8,832 bytes)
7. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: Steve Bettencourt <steveb5815@edgenet.net>; Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 12:02:44 -0500; I'm not sure about the law but I have seen old (30's) tail lights that were amber with red brake lights but this may have been before dual filament bulbs. (Just guessing) On the MG light the bottom; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00733.html (8,107 bytes)
8. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: "John A. Wise" <wise@db.erau.edu>; Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 10:02:14 -0500; == Bob HOWARD wrote == Then in a later post he noted ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In the research that resulted in the high mounted 3rd brake light, several different brake/running/; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00779.html (8,650 bytes)
9. Re: tail lights (score: 1): Author: mgbob@juno.com (ROBERT G. HOWARD); Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 10:59:39 EDT; Hi John, Thanks for that insight. The contrast of dark to light would certainly be more obvious than light to brighter. I've had quite enough close approaches to the back of the GT. At first I instal; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00781.html (10,798 bytes)
10. Re: Tail Lights (score: 1): Author: Chris Kotting <ckotting@iwaynet.net>; Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 07:43:37 -0400; I asked someone that once after they cut off my dad and me in his '47 TC (High noon, sunny skies, black car, visibility SHOULDN"T have been a problem). I managed to ask the question in a calm enough; /html/mgs/1998-05/msg00818.html (9,203 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]