- 1. the 4/4 +4 debate (score: 1)
- Author: William Zehring <zehrinwa@UMDNJ.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 15:28:21 -0500 (EST)
- Fellow fiends: Bob N. has taken the high road here by offering a frank and sincere assesment of the 4/4 and the +4 and I appreciate his jesture. In keeping with that spirit of friendlyness, it is inc
- /html/morgans/1997-02/msg00081.html (6,715 bytes)
- 2. Re: the 4/4 +4 debate (score: 1)
- Author: NKED65A@prodigy.com ( BOB NOGUEIRA)
- Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 19:54:26, -0500
- -- [ From: Bob Nogueira * EMC.Ver #3.1a ] -- Yes it is hard for Will to take the "high road" as he is so accustom to avoiding any kind of hill in that anemic 4/4 of his :) BTW Do you think he also ha
- /html/morgans/1997-02/msg00084.html (6,776 bytes)
- 3. Re: the 4/4 +4 debate (score: 1)
- Author: LanceKL@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 11:09:47 -0500 (EST)
- << Bob Nogueira PS I think Will and I started this +4 vs 4/4 thing on the first week the Morgan list was operational . Bob, You both just need to get a Plus 8!!! ;-) Lance Lipscomb Mog South 81 Plus
- /html/morgans/1997-02/msg00089.html (6,722 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu