Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*the\s+geez\s+classing\s+system\s+$Art\s+E$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*the\s+geez\s+classing\s+system\s+$Art\s+E$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: the geez classing system (Art E) (score: 1): Author: KWall73108@aol.com; Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 03:21:43 EDT; When Rich co-drove your car, was the geez running, did he outscore you? The geez can be tuned to give more critical ratings if needed, see Byron's last article in North American Pylon. Hopefully you; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01456.html (6,959 bytes)
2. Re: the geez classing system (Art E) (score: 1): Author: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 14:28:24 GMT; Yes and no. On our last left course runs, we both scored within a tenth of each other in overall ratings, yet he was 0.9 seconds faster. Both of us had a slew of 99% runs over the weekend, and none o; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01484.html (9,458 bytes)
3. Re: the geez classing system (Art E) (score: 1): Author: Todd Green <tag@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:12:30 -0600; It sounds to me like you have a configuration problem with how you have GEEZ setup (perhaps cube calibration errors). I've never seen/heard the ratings system report numbers like you've experienced.; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01495.html (8,404 bytes)
4. Re: the geez classing system (Art E) (score: 1): Author: "Arthur Emerson" <vreihen@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 17:45:31 GMT; I'd love to say this was true, but we had two different cubes running at the same time in the car at Harrisburg! GEEZ Cube ^2 ! :-) One was capturing at 10 samples/second, the other one at 20. The on; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01507.html (9,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]