Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*the\s+whole\s+NT\/participation\s+thing\s+\[long\]\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: sgt2@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:06:07 -0400
I am certainly not on the top 50 poster list, but this issue is a rather important one. So I thought I'd toss my opinion into the discussion. It's good to see that a few people like John Eagan actual
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01598.html (11,750 bytes)

2. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: Mari L Clements <mrndr2@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:15:55 -0400
[snip] Two quick comments. First, how are you going to decide what top-level competition is? Finishing position at a National Tour against real competition? (Oops. Wait. Can't get into a National To
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01605.html (9,234 bytes)

3. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:06:03 -0500
and I'd say that the growing number of short-sighted individuals bitching on team.net about the very thing that Denver has been actively pursuing - the growth of Solo II - is pretty damn ridiculous.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01606.html (10,475 bytes)

4. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "John Gross" <jogross3@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:34:53 PDT
Steve had some points near the end of his post that limitless growth may not be the best goal for SCCA but there is one idea that he missed badly. If all of the top drivers in the country spend 100%
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01607.html (10,200 bytes)

5. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Brad Cox" <coxb@trimofran.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:46:04 -0500
bitching on team.net about the very thing that Denver has been actively pursuing - the growth of Solo II - is pretty damn ridiculous.<< Yep. Perceptive folks are counting their blessings right now.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01608.html (9,138 bytes)

6. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:49:36 -0400 (EDT)
The fact that this time I was the one that procrastinated and didn't enter early enough has no bearing on the problem itself. Entries are (apparently) rising. With no penalty for entering early and
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01609.html (9,726 bytes)

7. RE: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:39:10 -0700
I agree with Mari Clements except for one thing: So, if 300+ entrants send their entries in ahead of time, then what? Katie K.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01610.html (8,385 bytes)

8. RE: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: Nicholas Horton <nhorton@reliacom.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:25:33 -0400
They found it in 45 pounds of humongous positive displacement supercharging boost. Nick
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01612.html (8,464 bytes)

9. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: jon e prevo <tcbracer@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:00:07 -0500
And all of the assembled multitude said "amen." Jon FP 73 We're right. You're wrong. The horse is dead.
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01617.html (11,666 bytes)

10. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Steven T. Ekstrand" <cyberlaw@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2000 07:53:12 -0700
I'm a newbie (to autocross). I won't be running a National level event this year because I don't have a competitive car. I'm running my tow vehicle locally to learn about the sport while I'm converti
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01653.html (10,591 bytes)

11. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: sgt2@daimlerchrysler.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 11:12:31 -0400
John Gross wrote (and a few others replied with their flame-throwers on, some privately): not time with then Yes, I certainly did not touch on that idea in my original post. I thought it's quite evid
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01706.html (10,858 bytes)

12. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:01:35 -0400
<<<mutually exclusive. Everyone can play golf, but not everyone that is allowed to play against Tiger Woods in the U.S. Open. >>> Bzzt! Wrong! The entire premise of the US Open is that it is open to
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01735.html (8,450 bytes)

13. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "John Gross" <jogross3@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:11:36 PDT
That's true, and I actually also thought about pointing that out, but for argument's sake, I think his point was that you weren't guaranteed of getting to play Tiger if you got your registration in
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01736.html (8,856 bytes)

14. Re: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: AnalogMike@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 16:37:40 EDT
In PCA it is tough to get into drivers education days and club races too... I just got a card in the mail that I am 11th on the waiting list for the Watkins Glen club race. I mailed my entry on the m
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01739.html (9,126 bytes)

15. RE: the whole NT/participation thing [long] (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 13:42:16 -0700
argument's sake, I think his point was that you weren't guaranteed of getting to play Tiger if you got your registration in on time. You had to get the registration in on time AND qualify. This is n
/html/autox/2000-06/msg01743.html (7,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu