Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*to\s+buy\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+buy\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*to\s+buy\s+or\s+not\s+to\s+buy\?\?\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: Scott Cowle <scowle@mentorcollege.edu>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:51:35 -0600; My 440 has lost oil pressure after breaking in my new camshaft, I'm not sure why yet but I'll know by tonight but this whole episode has got me thinking. I'm approaching 180mph at maxton(179 last yea; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00211.html (8,485 bytes)
2. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:17:00 -0500; Depends on what it is Scott.... I'd rather have a set of Used Carrillo rods then a brand new set of eagles....( not that they are bad...they just aren't as good ) Quality lasts the lifetime of the co; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00212.html (9,635 bytes)
3. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 09:31:29 -0700; In most cases, age does not make a part less serviceable, if it was a good part to start with. The engine we ran last year used a stock 302 crank that was manufactured in 1969 and used Carrillo rods; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00213.html (9,794 bytes)
4. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:09:44 -0700; If it was me I would invest in a new BHJ or other SFI approved damper and run the rest of the parts. I'm running a 71 year old crank. Pulled out the center main bearing web once, bent the crank so th; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00214.html (9,768 bytes)
5. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: Joe Timney <joetimney@dol.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 14:25:02 -0400; Mag the parts and run what passes!!! I'd buy an aftermarket dampner NEW!!! joe /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00217.html (9,462 bytes)
6. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:32:43 -0500; Keith & List; Metal parts such as rods, cranks, pistons, rocker arms, bolts, etc. all have a limited fatigue life. This is expressed an "N" cycle life, where "N" is the number of stress cycles that t; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00219.html (10,841 bytes)
7. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:28:08 -0400; Gotta disagree with that one. Aluminum rods may cycle sooner than steel rods, but what's a short time? I've had my best success at Bonneville with aluminum rods and still using them. JB -- Original M; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00222.html (9,367 bytes)
8. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: ardunbill@webtv.net; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 20:16:52 -0400 (EDT); Neil, I'm glad you mentioned fatigue life, maybe we can kick this around a little. I recently read a tech article by Kevin Cameron(probably the best mc tech writer active today) in the journal of the; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00223.html (9,849 bytes)
9. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:41:40 -0500; I think one thing you can read between the lines in what Neil wrote is that most of out LSR efforts stress most kinds of rods well above 60% of yield. (Super rods-- like Carillos-- may be an excepti; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00225.html (10,453 bytes)
10. Fw: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Richard Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 07:28:28 -0700; it pounds traceable one yield. often know case, parts. collect /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00231.html (11,646 bytes)
11. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:42:55 -0500; If we knew what stress was on the aluminum rods, we could look on an "S-N" diagram for that particular alloy and find out how many cycles to failure to expect. How long you can run aluminum rods dep; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00232.html (10,484 bytes)
12. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:21:55 -0500; Good job, Neil. You "told it like it is" very well, and spread a little engineering on the lsr community. Probably Carillos are the best for most lsr aps (like everyone thinks)-- but even Carillos wi; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00246.html (8,084 bytes)
13. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 07:42:26 -0400; Yup, the only rod that ever broke on me at Bonneville was a Carillo. but /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archiv; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00248.html (9,624 bytes)
14. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 08:33:59 -0700; I have broken lots of rods at Bonneville, all stock rods except one, which was a Carrillo. In this case it was because of a spun bearing. I can say one think negative about the Carrillo. It made a b; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00253.html (9,764 bytes)
15. Re: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Jonathan Amo" <webmaster@landracing.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 11:13:15 -0600; Good reply tom, money can buy you the best but there is always a way to break it. Jon /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listin; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00256.html (9,918 bytes)
16. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 11:02:10 -0500; You are absolutely correct. The "S-N" diagram "number of cycles" scale is logarithmic and at low stresses, the curve flattens out so the fatigue life is essentially indefinite. When we're talking ab; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00285.html (10,197 bytes)
17. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 07:39:42 -0500; I'm going to try to be more brief than usual(!). I have 3 points: 1. Many factors whose quantities cannot be known precisely, can be estimated well enough to produce very valuable results, if one ha; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00286.html (10,081 bytes)
18. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 09:53:40 -0500; getting back to some interesting ideas you brought-up w/ respect to rod strength, fatigue life, etc-- you said... Then too, which steels and irons, out of hundreds of varieties in use, have an infin; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00287.html (13,119 bytes)
19. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2003 23:34:15 -0500; maybe rambling-- as you say-- but some good, solid, engineering points. However, I think you mean the S-N curve is exponential, not "logarithmic"; as stress increases, the number of cycles to failur; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00296.html (10,624 bytes)
20. RE: to buy or not to buy?????? (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:31:23 -0500; We're both right-- I said the " "number of cycles" scale is logarithmic"-- the time axis is a log scale-- not the actual data itself. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ Neil: maybe rambling-- as you say-- but; /html/land-speed/2003-06/msg00301.html (10,947 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]