- 1. to the boneyard! (score: 1)
- Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring)
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 11:42:18 -0500
- Chris, et al.: I guess I'll express the contrary opinion here and even say a few things that border on heresy. All of your options are do-able more or less, with differing ammounts of time and money
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00146.html (8,611 bytes)
- 2. Re: to the boneyard! (score: 1)
- Author: dcouncil@imt.net (David Councill)
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:31:37 -0700
- A SAAB over an MG? On this MG discussion group no less. I would have to vote for blasphemy. :) Actually, I thought the heresy was the other comments on the SAAB. Because MGs are still a relatively c
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00151.html (8,154 bytes)
- 3. Re: to the boneyard! (score: 1)
- Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton)
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 17:32:15 +0500
- Maybe not as blasphemous as it first appears. As I recall, older Saab's were powered by Triumph engines. Granted, not the 900, but there's still a *tiny* bit of kinship there. -- Jay Tilton / jtilto
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00153.html (6,997 bytes)
- 4. Re: to the boneyard! (score: 1)
- Author: wzehring@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu (Will Zehring)
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 17:04:17 -0500
- David protests: No, you misunderstand (honest)! I'd rather push an MG than ride in a Saab, and I'm half Sweedish! :-) I intended that the Saab would become the *sacrificial* auto in the salty winter
- /html/mgs/1995-12/msg00156.html (6,923 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu