Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torker\&\s+carter\s+AFB\s+\-Reply\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torker\&\s+carter\s+AFB\s+\-Reply\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 16:55:47 -0500; A B Performer 289 3.50" 4.75" Torker II 4.00" 5.18" Performer RPM 4.30" 5.50" I believe a Performer 289 will clear but I don't know about a Performer RPM. If the RPM does, then a Torker II should as; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00128.html (8,241 bytes)
2. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 17:21:52 -0700; Dan, Thanks for the measurements. I have used the Performer on my Mustang. A good manifold, compared to the stock 4 BBL, but not in the league of the Performer RPM, which is, as the numbers show, a h; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00130.html (9,997 bytes)
3. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 09:59:20 -0500; It is a single plane. Windsor states his is a Torker 289 but what Edelbrock now lists is a Torker II which may or may not be the same as a Torker 289. They redesigned some of the early intakes but ot; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00135.html (8,764 bytes)
4. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:39:24 -0700; Thanks for the very informative postings guys. I have a Holley (modified 1850) on top of an F4B dual-plane intake manifold. Even with the repro LAT 79 hood there is scant room for an effective air c; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00144.html (11,041 bytes)
5. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 22:49:39 EDT; I'm running a F4B and Holley 600 with an original LAT hood. I'm also using the orginal AC air cleaner and have to problem hitting the hood. My orginal steel hood also cleared. One thing that may expl; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00145.html (7,865 bytes)
6. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>; Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 20:45:35 -0700; Thanks for the comments. With the original air cleaner I was able to even add some spacers under the carb for isolation, etc. But with my new, super-bitchin, specially made by Dale, low restriction,; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00146.html (8,692 bytes)
7. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Daniel Jones <djones2@mdc.com>; Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 12:59:51 -0500; Super Ford did a big test of intakes on a 5.0L crate motor. There were lots of intakes including the Torker II and a reproduction Tiger intake (a low rise intake, not the F4B. The test was conducted; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00153.html (10,651 bytes)
8. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@home.com; Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 11:19:20 -0400; Weiand (say Why-and) was just bought out by Holley. They had been making heads & manifolds back to the old flathead Ford days. Sad to see a leading brand sell out. But money talks. Pretty soon , ther; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00163.html (11,664 bytes)
9. Re: torker& carter AFB -Reply (score: 1): Author: Paul Burr <tigerpb@ids.net>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 20:49:34 -0400; Reminds me of an editorial cartoon a few years back- the world had been reduced to one giant company- "Food, Sex and Money Inc." With all the Chysler-Benz, Ford-Volvo, VW-Rolls etc. megers, the auto; /html/tigers/1999-05/msg00197.html (8,396 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]