Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torque\s+tightening\s+help\s+needed\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 12:50:10 EDT
I have a wheel hub nut that the manual (Volvo) calls for 13 inch pounds. My torque wrench is is foot pounds. Is there a conversion formula? Thanks in advance. Mark L.
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00010.html (6,825 bytes)

2. RE: torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:59:04 -0700
This one's easy Mark, 12 inches per foot, so 13/12 = 1.08 lb-ft of torque.
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00011.html (6,942 bytes)

3. RE: torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Palmer" <rpalmerbob@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 10:08:41 -0700
Mark - The Tiger Manual adjustment instructions say to tighten to 15-20 lb-ft while rotating the wheel and then back off one to one and one-half flats. The end float spec is 0.002-0.007". Instead of
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00012.html (7,327 bytes)

4. Re: torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: "Ross Hulse" <phulse@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 10:27:03 -0700
"I have a wheel hub nut that the manual (Volvo) calls for 13 inch pounds. My torque wrench is is foot pounds. Is there a conversion formula? Thanks in advance. Mark L." Mark, 12 inch pounds = 1 foot
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00013.html (7,089 bytes)

5. RE: torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:20:05 -0400
13 inch pounds is basically finger tight. My 1988 Ford Mustang is like that. Set the bearing with 20 ft-lbs while turning the hub; back off the nut 1/2 turn; torque nut to 15 in-lbs. I have a 1/4" d
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00015.html (7,783 bytes)

6. Re: torque tightening help needed (score: 1)
Author: CoolVT@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 14:52:20 EDT
Thanks to all who responded to my question on ft.-in. lbs. It was an easy answer that I considered, but it seemed too simple:-) Thanks again, Mark
/html/tigers/2006-09/msg00016.html (6,846 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu