Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torque\s+vs\.\s+hp\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*torque\s+vs\.\s+hp\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. torque vs. hp (score: 1): Author: "Jim Anderson" <jimbo.ander@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:37:39 -0500; Just to run this thread totally into the ground, I recall reading some 30 years ago about a British hill-climb car, handbuilt from a tiny chassis (an MG or something like that,with the frame extended; /html/tigers/2003-11/msg00038.html (7,348 bytes)
2. Re: torque vs. hp (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:16:13 -0800 (PST); The physics behind this is actually that the engine lacked the hp at low rpms to provide enough force at the road contact. The engines are designed to maximize power at a near constant (and high) rpm; /html/tigers/2003-11/msg00040.html (7,815 bytes)
3. RE: torque vs. hp (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:59:24 -0800; Thank you! Bob Palmer rpalmer@ucsd.edu rpalmerbob@adelphia.net The physics behind this is actually that the engine lacked the hp at low rpms to provide enough force at the road contact. The engines a; /html/tigers/2003-11/msg00043.html (7,078 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]