Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*traction\s+control\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*traction\s+control\s*$/: 242 ]

Total 242 documents matching your query.

101. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 18:15:33 -0400; Ok if it is a problem then you don't have to enter a car in them??? /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00042.html (8,766 bytes)
102. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 15:44:23 -0700; Ok, my 2 bits worth. What benefits are to gain from TC other than not smoking a set or drive tires by overspin? It does not affect top speed at all. Only the time to get to top speed. And that seems; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00043.html (9,939 bytes)
103. RE: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 07:43:48 -0500; 0ne streamliner operator (whose record is not yet over 300mph) told me he has over $3/4 million invested in his engine, alone. The most expensive traction control devices are "chump change", by comp; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00045.html (9,704 bytes)
104. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 16:47:24 -0700; You have a reasonable request mayf. The salt is different enough from all other racing surfaces that any prediction about what will actually happen is just a guess. I'd like us to be smart enough to; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00046.html (10,725 bytes)
105. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 20:20:07 -0400; Wonder how much Marlo Treit has in his new 'liner? Or Rick Vesco, Or the Burklands? This ain't a low budget form of racing guys. Doesn't mean a low budget guy can't have some fun, but don't expect t; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00047.html (10,618 bytes)
106. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 20:27:52 -0400; Yeah, like NASCAR restrictor plates. JB -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com> Cc: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; "; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00049.html (8,950 bytes)
107. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 20:35:15 -0400; Sure Mayf, but won't help you much, unless you got the bucks to buy one. And that propably won't help anyway. NASCAR and NHRA have been all over this, they have the deep pocket books and still can't; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00050.html (11,111 bytes)
108. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 20:43:26 -0400; Man ain't that the truth. Been building a 300 MPH car, on a budget, LOL, and there ain't nothin cheep about it. And what's my time worth? Still might not put in TC if it were legal. Just like it won'; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00051.html (9,267 bytes)
109. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: john@theromeros.org; Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 21:38:34 -0700; I worked in CART as an engine guy from 1995 to 2001. All everyone argued about was traction control and cost containment. put $500 into traction control, they will simply take $500 from elsewhere on; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00053.html (10,398 bytes)
110. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 01:35:03 EDT; << NASCAR and NHRA have been all over this, they have the deep pocket books and still can't control it. >> F-1 too! I say let 'em go ahead and slow down to go fast. I'll keep do'in it a different way; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00054.html (8,719 bytes)
111. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 01:32:01 EDT; << I believe that there are VERY FEW cars (or bikes) competing now at speeds over 300mph that don't have well over $100k in them. >> I can name one 300 mph door slammer that don't have anywhere near; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00055.html (8,880 bytes)
112. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Flowbench@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 01:43:09 EDT; << For instance, electronic fuel injection costs very little more than my present setup, but the dyno time to properly dial it in is above many participant's budget. >> Tom, I agree dyno time costs,; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00056.html (9,026 bytes)
113. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Bryan Savage <basavage@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 23:13:08 -0700; How true. If you can't drive it onto the trailer, leave it in the garage. Bryan /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo ///; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00057.html (8,627 bytes)
114. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 05:27:08 -0400; Unfortunately you are paying for the stealth technology not the traction control technology.. If it is all out in the open the cost goes way down. Dave /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majo; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00059.html (8,964 bytes)
115. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 07:38:28 -0400; -- Original Message -- From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net> To: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com> Cc: "DrMayf" <drmayf@teknett.com>; "land speed" <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sent: Sunday,; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00060.html (9,417 bytes)
116. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 09:28:06 -0400; I would like to think a car that is raced ought to be as technologically advanced as the one i used to drive to the track.. ABS is a nightmare, traction control or more properly put torgue control vi; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00061.html (9,272 bytes)
117. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: John Goodman <ggl205@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 06:50:13 -0700 (PDT); "...put torgue control via and automatic reduction in power output is a no brainer.." Dave, I know of at least one MC streamliner that controls traction this way. I questioned the legality of this an; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00062.html (9,406 bytes)
118. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 10:26:38 -0400; Hmmm... If this is true, than an SCTA clarification maybe in order! That way the rest of us that are trying to obey the rules can benefit from this as well. /// unsubscribe/change address requests to; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00064.html (9,904 bytes)
119. Re: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "Bill Bennett" <bennevl@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 11:49:06 -0400; OOOPS does this mean I can't use the retard feature of an MSD box to take some timing out that will reduce power to limit wheel slip. Guess I need to take that switch out, so will everyone else!!!!!!; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00065.html (10,433 bytes)
120. RE: Traction Control (score: 1): Author: "Russel Mack" <rtmack@concentric.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 00:46:49 -0500; I worked in CART as an engine guy from 1995 to 2001. All everyone argued about was traction control and cost containment. put $500 into traction control, they will simply take $500 from elsewhere on; /html/land-speed/2003-08/msg00068.html (10,842 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]