Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tractor\s+rec\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tractor\s+rec\'s\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Paul F Mele" <Paul.Mele@usermail.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:51:26 -0500; Just bouught 20 acres out of town. solid trees. hurricaine Fran leftovers, I'm considering buying a used small tractor for doing hauling and pushing around the property over the next 25 years. Actual; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00091.html (7,731 bytes)
2. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Elton Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 22:43:13 -0600; Your note will go up on the bulletin boards of a many a tractor dealership where it will provoke months of laughs . . /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// h; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00092.html (7,860 bytes)
3. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "James Ferguson" <jferg@who.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 00:06:24 -0500; If you want to do some work on 20Ac. with storm damage better plan on at least $10,000 for a tractor with a loader. At least a 30hp (engine) or 30 hp (drawbar) if you are serious. Get a good one so i; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00093.html (8,314 bytes)
4. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: Dave Williams <ronin@aristotle.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 02:23:42 -0600; That's going to be an entirely local thing. However, if you plan to buy or borrow attachments for the three-point, you need to be aware that the PTO drives on older equipment are *not* all the same.; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00094.html (10,190 bytes)
5. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: Mike Sloane <msloane@att.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 06:33:16 -0500; Actually, for about $2000 you can pick up an older, but still competent It will be larger than today's imported compact models, but still able to work for longer days than you. Surf over to the Antiq; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00096.html (9,121 bytes)
6. RE: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Gerald Brazil" <gerrybraz@voyager.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 07:31:55 -0500; Michigan State University Salvage has a nice 1943 Ford tractor up for sealed bids. They are accepting bids starting at $2k. See the link... http://surplus.msu.edu/sealed_bids/sealed_bid.htm /// unsub; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00097.html (8,208 bytes)
7. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "TONY CLARK" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:12:14 -0600; Mike amended: tractor. you I 1962 Okay Mike, but are you pretty sure that that $2000 tractor will be up to pushing 20 acres of hurricane spoiled timber for 25 years? That was the query. Tony Tractor; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00098.html (8,845 bytes)
8. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "TONY CLARK" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 10:41:31 -0600; condition at a good price, then found out that though standard-size attachments would fit the three-point, the PTO: A) had a smaller than standard spline B) turned in the opposite direction from norm; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00099.html (9,252 bytes)
9. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 11:11:53 -0800; As other people mentioned, at that price range you are looking at older American tractors. You might be able to find a very used Japanese tractor that needs something-- just a couple weeks ago there; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00100.html (9,680 bytes)
10. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: Mike Sloane <msloane@att.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:26:43 -0500; TONY CLARK wrote: Actually, the truth is that the Cub PTO ran at engine speeds (about three times faster than the "standard" PTO. Part of the reason was that it was much less expensive to manufacture; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00101.html (11,494 bytes)
11. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "TONY CLARK" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:41:58 -0600; flywheel, it Don't bet any real money on this, my LAWNMOWER will drag an old Cub backwards! Below is the universally recognized test of an original Cub . . .9 horsepower belt (equivalent to PTO) and; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00102.html (10,126 bytes)
12. RE: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:36:22 -0800; Must be one heavy lawnmower, if it can pull 1600 pounds on turf tires ! Note that the test only mentions the rated horsepower, the actual drawbar horsepower demonstrated in their test G is more like; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00103.html (9,061 bytes)
13. Fw: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Elton Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 00:35:51 -0600; Randall replied: Actually, my favorite lawn mower is a 4wd Kubota with fat traction tires (!). and it would only have to pull the 800 pound capability of the Cub. . drawbar horsepower demonstrated in; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00104.html (10,133 bytes)
14. RE: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 23:19:25 -0800; Well, that's only rated capability in 2nd gear. At least to my mind "dragging it backwards" implies a little more than beating it's rated pull in 2nd gear ... and it's sure not something I'd want to; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00105.html (9,463 bytes)
15. Re: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Elton Clark" <lotus.tony@airmail.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 11:31:30 -0600; Randall reacted! In Neb. tests, every gear is tried until "maximum pull" is attained . . in this case and often in the "unweighted" tests, an intermediate gear provides "maximum pull". Traction is us; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00110.html (10,000 bytes)
16. RE: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Randall Young" <ryoung@navcomtech.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 10:33:51 -0800; There are multiple facets to the standard Nebraska tests, not all of them test maximum pull. And, as I said before, maximum pull is _not_ maximum horsepower. The test _you_ quoted (note the undersco; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00111.html (10,728 bytes)
17. RE: tractor rec's (score: 1): Author: "Paul F Mele" <Paul.Mele@usermail.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:34:04 -0500; Well, I'm back ... thanks for all the info on low-end tractors. I've passed on the rec's to my friend/ neighbor, and we'll start looking around. I'll keep you posted. Paul /// unsubscribe/change addr; /html/shop-talk/2002-03/msg00183.html (7,635 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]