- 1. u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie)
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 10:35:05 +0100
- Hi all I just checked out a neat web site (www.usradiators.com) they have a novel concept of radiator design. Triple flow which they claim is the most efficient. the radiator is made with three separ
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00674.html (7,557 bytes)
- 2. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 11:58:11 -0700
- Armand, Lorie, et Listers, I couldn't access this site, but with regard to a triple-pass radiator, this is certainly not a new concept. I first saw this type of radiator in the mid '70s, and they pro
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00675.html (9,252 bytes)
- 3. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Hankins" <jhankins@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 03:30:52 -0400
- Just curious, but where does the 9 times flow resistance come from? Friction loss in pipe is directly proportional to the length of pipe (the additional bends would accounted for by adding equivalen
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00676.html (10,123 bytes)
- 4. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: befarkas@ncsu.edu (Brian E. Farkas)
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 15:36:51 -0500
- Hi Gang, I don't get to write in very often as I don't (as yet) have a Tiger, but in the area of heat transfer, fluid mechanics, and heat exchangers I can contribute! The comment on the triple pass r
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00677.html (11,669 bytes)
- 5. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: befarkas@ncsu.edu (Brian E. Farkas)
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 15:51:25 -0500
- Hi Joe and the gang. Me again... Regarding the 9 times and Joe's statement that: That is only true for laminar flow and I would bet (hope) that we have turbulent flow in our radiators. The presence o
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00678.html (11,067 bytes)
- 6. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: TigerCoupe@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 17:52:30 EDT
- To all professors, rocket scientists, fluid dynamics engineers, etc. on the Uh-oh. He we go. Maybe you guys could discuss this radiator thing on another channel and then get back to us stupid Tiger o
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00679.html (7,291 bytes)
- 7. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: ritchie@mcn.org (Armand & Lorie Ritchie)
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 16:01:35 +0100
- try this address:(http://www.usradiator.com/default.htm) it just worked for me. regards Armand ritchie@mcn.org Armand & Lorie Ritchie
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00680.html (7,355 bytes)
- 8. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 16:25:10 -0700
- The "hot link" worked, the way you are now specifying it. Even the site exists. But, I have had some experience with the company. I put a 4 row Desert Cooler, they tout, in my '65 Mustang GT convert
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00681.html (8,339 bytes)
- 9. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
- Whoa there...... I have a Tiger. It tends to run hot. I want to hear all I can about cooling it; theory and application. I vote for a change in venue for TAC discussions instead. Regards, Jim Parent
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00688.html (7,291 bytes)
- 10. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: "Norman C. Miller" <rootes1@best.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 23:18:04 -0700
- Second "SERIES" ALPINE COOLING FEEDBACK 1. Does your III take a pee? 2. When's a II number I? 3. I is the loneliest number that you'll ever be.
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00689.html (7,388 bytes)
- 11. Re: u s radiators (score: 1)
- Author: "James Pickard" <geowiz@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 07:38:02 -0500
- I second the motion. Jim Pickard B9473298 --
- /html/tigers/1998-08/msg00690.html (7,924 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu